Is it OK if I make a thread discussing Peter Singer?

Wszystkie dyskusje > Fora Steam > Off Topic > Szczegóły wątku

Azor 11 listopada 2023 o 17:44

I'm afraid Peter Singer is too based for OT, thus discussing his philosophy may get me banned.
Test. Which of these words are bannable: abortion, veganism, infanticide, zoophilia.

< >

Wyświetlanie 16-28 z 28 komentarzy

fnv 12 listopada 2023 o 20:05

Początkowo opublikowane przez Apexnexius:
Peter Singer is one of my favorite contemporary philosophers.

I really like how Singer challenges global distribution morals and his commitments to animal rights. Ethics is as important now as ever!

Peter Singer was part of our curriculum at university.

didnt someone above me just say hes a zoophile

#16

Apexnexius 12 listopada 2023 o 20:07

Początkowo opublikowane przez Kat:
Początkowo opublikowane przez Apexnexius:
Peter Singer is one of my favorite contemporary philosophers.

I really like how Singer challenges global distribution morals and his commitments to animal rights. Ethics is as important now as ever!

Peter Singer was part of our curriculum at university.
didnt someone above me just say hes a zoophile

Are we only going to learn about philosophers we agree with 100% ?
If so, then goodbye to all higher learning and our Western Civilization.

EDIT:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Singer
Still alive and kicking !

EDIT 2:
His 'Effective Altruism' is for real. The man knows how to donate !

Ostatnio edytowany przez: Apexnexius; 12 listopada 2023 o 20:15

#17

xAlphaStarOmegax 12 listopada 2023 o 20:10

Początkowo opublikowane przez Kat:
Początkowo opublikowane przez Apexnexius:
Peter Singer is one of my favorite contemporary philosophers.

I really like how Singer challenges global distribution morals and his commitments to animal rights. Ethics is as important now as ever!

Peter Singer was part of our curriculum at university.
didnt someone above me just say hes a zoophile

I looked it up, and yeah, from what I gather, he promotes that filth.

#18

fnv 12 listopada 2023 o 20:11

Początkowo opublikowane przez xAlphaStarOmegax:
Początkowo opublikowane przez Kat:
didnt someone above me just say hes a zoophile
I looked it up, and yeah, from what I gather, he promotes that filth.

♥♥♥♥ that guy, op is crazy and he should be sent to a mental asylum, case closed.

#19

xAlphaStarOmegax 12 listopada 2023 o 20:15

Początkowo opublikowane przez Kat:
Początkowo opublikowane przez xAlphaStarOmegax:
I looked it up, and yeah, from what I gather, he promotes that filth.
♥♥♥♥ that guy, op is crazy and he should be sent to a mental asylum, case closed.

Sadly, nothing shocks me about this world and the people in it anymore.

I don't care how good of a philosopher he claims to be; I would never align myself with anyone who promoted abortion, eugenics, or zoophilia.

It baffles me how anyone could claim to be for animal rights, yet they want to advocate for sexually abusing animals. It makes zero sense.

#20

Tiberius 12 listopada 2023 o 20:34

A hardcore utilitarianism fan who prolly nvr get the shorter end of the stick in his life

#21

Azor 13 listopada 2023 o 5:41

Początkowo opublikowane przez Apexnexius:
Początkowo opublikowane przez Kat:
didnt someone above me just say hes a zoophile
Are we only going to learn about philosophers we agree with 100% ?
If so, then goodbye to all higher learning and our Western Civilization.

EDIT:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Singer
Still alive and kicking !

EDIT 2:
His 'Effective Altruism' is for real. The man knows how to donate !

You gave an excellent response and it went ignored...

I'm starting to think it is not a good idea to discuss Singer at Off-Topic Or phiilosophy for that matter.

It would probably go like this.

"Nice argument, but have you considered that Singer supports zoophilia?"

"Nice argument, but have you considered that Kant was racist?"

"Nice argument, but have you considered that Nietzsche was a mysogynist?"

"Nice argument, but have you considered that Heidegger was a nazi?"

Ad hominem, poisoning the well.

People seem to think that if you're not a saint, then you have nothing worthwhile to say regardless of the soundness of your arguments. Moralist logic.

#22

xAlphaStarOmegax 13 listopada 2023 o 9:52

Początkowo opublikowane przez Azor:
Początkowo opublikowane przez Apexnexius:
Are we only going to learn about philosophers we agree with 100% ?
If so, then goodbye to all higher learning and our Western Civilization.

EDIT:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Singer
Still alive and kicking !

EDIT 2:
His 'Effective Altruism' is for real. The man knows how to donate !
You gave an excellent response and it went ignored...

I'm starting to think it is not a good idea to discuss Singer at Off-Topic Or phiilosophy for that matter.

It would probably go like this.

"Nice argument, but have you considered that Singer supports zoophilia?"

"Nice argument, but have you considered that Kant was racist?"

"Nice argument, but have you considered that Nietzsche was a mysogynist?"

"Nice argument, but have you considered that Heidegger was a nazi?"

Ad hominem, poisoning the well.

People seem to think that if you're not a saint, then you have nothing worthwhile to say regardless of the soundness of your arguments. Moralist logic.

I am sorry, but I personally don't wish to try and glean any little tidbits from what someone who supports zoophilia and abortion says.