rich people should be helping people than buying luxory items

[REALiNSaNgAMingGODPrODIgY]

oh this family is struggling in dept from collage loans and can barely buy a house but na me jeff bezos gonna buy a rocket to mars.



mr beast made wells in Africa and other stuff, but no nestle needs their profits.



like how can these people be rich and not care about people. like cool you put in effort and all this stuff but you got lucky no one thought of it before you or had the change to do something.



i don't mind people being successful but these company's would rather hurt people and be at the top then to help people grow.


i am not saying they should help everyone but even a few people is still a win.



i really hate this world where people want to be rich and then buying items flexing their wealth and acting like a holes instead of helping people. i can't believe people don't get karma ether for being so selfish.



people say you would do the same, no i would not. i believe in having enough money so i don't struggle to live and would give the rest away. i don't need a mansion or a yathy or other fancy things to be happy. legit simple person who enjoys the simple life.

[Fishie]

Birds a écrit :

Fishie a écrit :

Because that not how it works lol and sponsors don't want to be president probably for that reason.

But secret service is better now I don't think we ever have assassination again in the future if we do it would be sad but maybe someone didn't do their job.

Secret service isn't superheros, and even if they were the president would have to be some kind of futuristic combat cyborg to reasonably expect to defend themselves.

Sponsors don't want to be president because they can get someone else to get shot for them.

Seems right lol. But secret service goes through alot of training only issue is when they fall for you makes job a bit harder. But I do like how if you quit or retire you get secret service protection if you apply lol. Sucks how it doesn't protect all family members though as you know some crazies out there will go for the family.

[Fishie]

Birds a écrit :

talemore a écrit :

We can as well place the luxury in the dumpster.

The factory do not care if you have afford to buy.

Why, do factories determine the value of currency through production?

Does not the worker control the means of said production?

Because they have to pay for the parts. And for human mistakes if they mess up and doesn't get caught till later.

[talemore]

Birds a écrit :

talemore a écrit :

We can as well place the luxury in the dumpster.

The factory do not care if you have afford to buy.

Why, do factories determine the value of currency through production?

Does not the worker control the means of said production?

No, the workers are paid by the hour. And the factory is too good at making products.

We replaced workers with machines and now they run day and night.

Factories is like war. They're used for war and they have cycles.

We can't let them go since we have disabled the workers ability to work in anything else than inside the factory. The GDP drops in value if the workers produce anything else. The workers value as labour drop because they are producing something that has less value. We simply can't let them go or the economy will collapse.

[Birds]

talemore a écrit :

Birds a écrit :

Why, do factories determine the value of currency through production?

Does not the worker control the means of said production?

No, the workers are paid by the hour. And the factory is too good at making products.

We replaced workers with machines and now they run day and night.

Factories is like war. They're used for war and they have cycles.

We can't let them go since we have disabled the workers ability to work in anything else than inside the factory. The GDP drops in value if the workers produce anything else. The workers value as labour drop because they are producing something that has less value. We simply can't let them go or the economy will collapse.

factory is paid by the worker.

[RustledJimm]

Reminder, tax evasion, tax fraud and tax avoidance all add up substantially more than welfare fraud.

[Birds]

RustledJimm a écrit :

Reminder, tax evasion, tax fraud and tax avoidance all add up substantially more than welfare fraud.

not really; you can still get welfare after all of those.

[Ganger]

Birds a écrit :

So approximately 1% of the US can afford to run for office without a loan.

Not even to have a campaign; just to register to run.

In a ideal world, money shouldn't even be a feature to enter politics. People should run based on merit. Money has hijacked democracy where it does seem only the rich and powerful can even enter the race.

[Birds]

Ganger a écrit :

Birds a écrit :

So approximately 1% of the US can afford to run for office without a loan.

Not even to have a campaign; just to register to run.

In a ideal world, money shouldn't even be a feature to enter politics. People should run based on merit. Money has hijacked democracy where it does seem only the rich and powerful can even enter the race.

good thing the rich can just ♥♥♥♥ us whenever they want.

[Ganger]

Birds a écrit :

Ganger a écrit :

In a ideal world, money shouldn't even be a feature to enter politics. People should run based on merit. Money has hijacked democracy where it does seem only the rich and powerful can even enter the race.

good thing the rich can just ♥♥♥♥ us whenever they want.

So true.... having money means you can also buy safely by living behind gated communities protected by guards and security. Plus being rich gets rid of everyday stress most of us have to deal with like... how to pay the next bill, how im I going to afford to buy my children clothes etc. While we have to budget, they don't have too.

I have nothing against the rich people. What I do have issue with and I keep saying it... the hypocrisy of many rich folk who expect you to sacrifice things and even sacrifice your health so their can push a agenda / narrative these people don't even follow. A example....

Wanting you to cut down on your carbon footprint... all I see from them is hypocrisy due to them flying across the world, using private jets to travel city to city, driving big gas guzzling cars, having big houses that take a lot of carbon to power and the worst thing of all... telling you it's your fault climate change is happening.

[talemore]

Birds a écrit :

talemore a écrit :

No, the workers are paid by the hour. And the factory is too good at making products.

We replaced workers with machines and now they run day and night.

Factories is like war. They're used for war and they have cycles.

We can't let them go since we have disabled the workers ability to work in anything else than inside the factory. The GDP drops in value if the workers produce anything else. The workers value as labour drop because they are producing something that has less value. We simply can't let them go or the economy will collapse.

factory is paid by the worker.

No. The worker do not pay. The workers are consumers of the products. The workers do not create a value on their own. This is why the worker is to be kept on a starving level to ensure they will not stop working. The work itself is to be granted a value that they will not want to quit.

It is simple logic that you can not create a fire without wood and the workers are like oxygen to the fire. No matter how much you try to make the oxygen into a resource the fire will extinquish.

The wood may start to lit on fire on its own by the factory owner producing value which make people attract to the factory but workers do not create a value.

We are catalyst the production with help of workers. Just like CPU is to a motherboard. The motherboard need energy to work. That energy is given from the state who give money to the factory with help of banks.

Even with the "order" the bank give money to the factory owner, the factory owner produce.
The bank and the factory consolidate the demand. New order created and a new cycle begin.

As you can see there is nothing about people who pay the factory but the order on demand.

[talemore]

What's going on today is that we have luxuries with monopoly.

People buy more food than they buy lightbulbs.

They lobby that the quality is up.

But the prices is not increasing because that would mean only China gain value increase.

There are forces left and right who do not want to pay higher prices for a lightbulb.