Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Pravidla a pokyny k diskuzím
Nahlásit tento příspěvek
Still they know how much they are spending out of their budget vs average voter who votes for endless charity while they complain of being broke.
There are homeless on the street but we should send billions in foreign aid while importing millions more dependents, the average voter in a democracy behaves as they are rich with an unlimited pot of money.
You might think your money is going to charity, but it's probably just a tax writeoff for someone in your class. And also charity, but mostly the other rich person they steal most of the wealth.
Even if they need to wait for your charity case to impvoerish themselves at the company store first.
i agree on this, america should be a community where everyone takes care of eachother rich or poor does not matter.
instead we are throwing money away or rich are buying useless ♥♥♥♥ for no reason instead of helping people.
entertainment is fine aka going to a movie or buying games to play buy to buy a house that is like 400 mill is stupid to me if i had that money i would just give it to charity. who would want the stress of owning a mill house.
the rich would rather buy a 50 mill car then help the homeless. no one is asking them to solve all hunger, they just want to just help people in gen. idk how they act like victims tbh. why are you being mean to me? uses gucci tissues.
Its not the rich throwing their money away, they buy services which pay wages.
Its poor people buying rims and netflix entertainment, and as stated the voting preferences of the so called poor is burn money while creating ever more dependents.
"Charity" has produced an inner city filled with single mothers, these are the incentives created by people who think they are "helping".
As stated most charity is a scam which only manufactures justification for its own existence, or to help push a political/social agenda.
The homeless can't be helped because the people voted for civil rights to ensure their freedom to make irresponsible life decisions based on the idea there is no wrong way to be.
The theoretical 50 million dollar car is Elon Musks Tesla, as the first cars rolled off the line they were no where near paying off the cost of investment. This created countless jobs and created a new industry.
The rich who waste money are almost certain to be women, simply look at what billionaire divorce wives spend their fortunes on. Usually social causes for women, basically grift ventures funding Karens of extortion. Paul Allen billionaire Microsoft founder funded museums and space ventures, when he died and it passed to his sister all those things came into question.
You want the answer to who wastes money in society its not going to be politically correct, as one gender is evolved to simply spend what men earn.
Funnily enough, I saw this article pop up today.
-----
Any grammatical errors are a result of my tired eyes.
Unrelated to the link—the general populous is horribly self-centred, to the point of blatant ignorance. Less so referring to the actual question itself and more so the given responses that typically follow.
Many people share narrow-minded perspectives on others in various situations based on limited or nonexistent experience while deriving their conclusions off of stereotypes and media portrayals. For example, a homeless person is, based off of stereotypes, a gruff middle-aged individual with a heroine needle in his arm on the side of a road. Although that may be applicable in some cases, it is not an accurate representation of all who fall under the blanket term, "homeless." Kids displaced by an addict/abusive/dead parent(s) have no say in the matter but, based on the logic of the ignorant opinions online, this is something that the children could have completely avoided. And the same goes for veterans, none of them want to suffer post-war, but were you out in the battlefield suffering the same way? Not likely. You have no point of reference.
This comes back onto experience, or lack thereof. Obviously it is impossible to tell how many have a narrow viewpoint AND have experience that backs said viewpoint. Though it can be said with certainty that a number of these opinions come from both a general lack of understanding and a life seldom exposed to such suffering. If you, in the ambiguous sense of the word, have lived a life without financial difficulties, violent abuse, disorders, or chronic disease, chances are you have never fully realized how easy it is to fall down that hole. Living paycheque to paycheque is very common (in Canada, about half the population), and falling behind in that race can drive a person down a spiral that they are going to struggle to climb out of or be completely swept away.
This assumption that these people don't (want to) work is, much like the viewpoint itself, ridiculous. Voluntary unemployment is a thing, of course, but those cases are few and far between. Getting ahead, financially I mean, borders on impossible for many, especially in rural communities. And if one is to become homeless, how are they supposed to get a job? With the way the system is structured right now, a homeless person, even if qualified, is unlikely to get a job because they lack an address, phone, clothing, etc. Once you're in, it's hard to get out.
Of all the people I have known and met, very few would consider their lives secure. 50+ year old men working 40+ hours a week barely scrape by while working back-breaking labour that pays about as good as retail. But there's nowhere else to work (that pays any better) and they don't have the money to relocate which is a common theme for people riding the poverty line.
A friend of mine, a manager for a convenience store on a nearby reservation, works full-time and lives with an "unsavoury" father and his "daughters," I think you know what I mean. She has nowhere else to go, to my knowledge, and had a falling out with her father after her graduation.
A former friend had been working her way towards culinary school until she had been kicked out of her grandmother's home because her psychosis was getting out of hand. She landed in her uncle's home in Saskatoon; a trap house shared with several other addicts. Within a couple years of relocating, she had turned to alternative methods to make a living. She's in prison now.
There's one person I know who has flourished because she made solid connections with her former manager and later had a few strokes of luck (after having worked four jobs simultaneously). She now operates a group home in the nicer part of Saskatoon.
And, as a little add-on: Whenever this topic is brought up there are always those who completely ignore the figures discussed. Why doesn't your average Joe give his extra money to the homeless? Probably because he doesn't know if he's got enough food for the month or, in the case of America, they need a reserve in the event they strike ill. It's a grade-school response to complex situation. Nobody is saying that the rich should pay to keep the homeless comfortable for their lives, no. They're questioning why rich folk don't throw what is essentially pocket change to these people so they can get a foothold and take themselves from their.
This stigma against homeless people is non-productive when you consider the fact that, if given basic security, they could contribute to your country's economy. Some might not show it here, the disdain that is, but it certainly exists.
Why do you care what people do with their money? It's their money. When common people become rich, do you think they want to help other people when they just became wealthy? People want fancy things because they show the good life. We all want the good life, but it is hard to achieve. We all have different dreams as well, and to achieve that dream, guess what it takes: money. Why don't you do it if you're so worried about it and watch you go broke? Oh, wait, you probably worried about going broke. Now you know what wealthy people feel.
Seems you just mad people earn their money and you can never get the good life because of bad choices. When you get wealthy do what you want as long as you don't do it for fame.
And don't you know wealthy people already help people but they don't post videos about it why because they know if they did they would be evil.
I've seen countless wealthy people in poor counties do you see videos of them nope and no news person posts videos of it as they get paid off to not do it or the news people do make videos but leave the people's names out as they requested it.
There is countless arguments in here. Mods are picking stuff lol
Lol so your jealous. They weren't Born with wealth their parents worked and made them wealthy or they won lottery.
If you gave something in return they would. And rich is rude. We wealthy not rich.
We is one of the rudest dudes that ever lived.
Lol I don't know we but okay.
No amount of training will help some people period. At work I have work colleagues who have been on many courses but are still broke due to bad spending habits. One guy I I know smokes a lot, he must spend £100+ a week on cigarettes and he is always complaining he is broke.
Another lad gambles and is always broke but complains alot. Another likes all the latest toys and is always broke. You simply can't help most people. And through their bad choices in life, it's the hard working people who have to pay more in taxes to support them.
That if they disabled. If not your taxes aren't paying for their habits. Giving money to other counties is a choice not a requirement if your state is forcing you do that then you could take it to Supreme Court.