Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
The rich is not earning more than you. He is just earning multiple times more than you. For example he earns $1 from a song he produced, but he sold 100,000 copies.
Now, we claim this rich person should donate $100,000 to the poor. So who is the poor now? The 100,000 people who paid. They are all in $1 debt. If this $100,000 is returned, then each only get back $1.
Assume the poor is someone unrelated. That poor gets $100,000. Will it be fair to the 100,000 people who paid?
It turns out, "the rich should donate to the poor" is equivalent to "someone should gather money from everyone and give it to someone who doesn't work". Is it fair for the group of people? If I request 1 million steam players to each give me $1 so I became a millionaire overnight, is it fair? It is not.
To make things fair, the poor should measure his earning against the majority, not against 1 rich. The poor should be given the same earning as the majority, or at least help to boost him to that passing entry level.
The rich can buy expensive things and that money is transferred over to other bosses, who will then transfer them back to the majority of workers.
And how much do you help OP?....now that you try to put it all on others to do
Ask google and you'll get plenty of results.
Some, or I could say most of them give out more money than your saint and savior Mr.beast ever did.
Contrary to your belief, rich people and business do care about the poor. Just not in the way you want.
A. A good start.
Basically just showing this sort of logic you can only dig deeper and deeper to the point where everyone can only wear rags (just enough to survive), eat only bland food just enough to survive, and live in apartment just enough to survive. Anything non essentials should be used to help the poor until they too have just enough to survive. It's a twisted logic.
Lmao no. It our money if you want to donate to people who made bad choices that you.
And Mr beast isn't a good person he doing it for fame and there is already a thread about this.
If you support evil that you but we dont.
Luxury*
<thisismycontribution>
We know this, most celebrities don't help others out of the goodness of their hearts, most do to further themselves. But people will chap and cheer them for doing so.
But lets be honest, what Mr Beast has done is helping people get fresh water. Nothing wrong with this even if Mr Beast is making money out of doing so. Because these people wouldn't be getting fresh water if it wasn't for Mr Beast.