Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
L'autore della discussione ha indicato un messaggio come risposta alla propria domanda.
Regole e linee guida per le discussioni
Segnala questo messaggio
Brother you misunderstand the situation.
I am all for showcasing people that are in fact guilty however in this discussion we discovered the issue was for false ban. The ban was incorrectly asserted and for that reverted and peoples accounts were rightfuly corrected from a stained VAC ban to a cleared account without a VAC ban. I until the post that was highlighted as the answer was given I thought they wrongfully kept those innocent players that never cheated VAC banned on their account and that was not the case. But to the idea that if they had left it as such would be of great issue for me and I believe most people.
Doesn't matter, no way to know until someone is innocent and if it was a mistake it will be expunged from their record. Exact same scenario as the legal system where if someone is wrongly convicted upon proving their innocence the false info would be removed.
Per your logic you'd never be able to ever display someone broke the rules because sometime in the future it "MIGHT" turn out to have been a mistake. The benefits of the system outweigh the very rare cases of false negatives.
Also they were never VAC banned, VAC is one of the most accurate ban systems in the world. Your getting confused between VAC bans and Game Bans which are two different things. A false VAC ban is incredibly rare and its over 99% accurate.
There is, and that shouldn't be too difficult to comprehend: "VAC ban shaming" happens when people are banned even though they weren't cheating. It's a rare thing, yes, but rare things happen.
Is it? Then why did that happen?
https://www.pcgamer.com/valve-warns-counter-strike-2-players-use-amds-anti-lag-feature-get-banned/
The other things previous to the last I cannot agree with. There is innocent until proven guilty where I am from and I cannot stand by while innocent people are punished for crimes they have not committed. Much less do I see why all of that was necessary. None of it relevant to the Steam discussion and borderline political and legal debate.
However given the later part of your statement you are correct in that there are game bans vs VAC bans and I was indeed confused on the subtle detail that can make all the difference. However this does not change the fact that it can and has created shaming in the community and can cause irreversible harm in the eyes of traders and people in the community. VAC bans itself maybe extremely accurate I have no quarrel with them but what is not fool proof clearly by the story at hand is game bans and how broken they can be. Yes in this case it was corrected but what about the few out there that have not been? I realize it isn't a perfect world and the idea of one sin can be considered egregious at best but the story in this was on such a catastrophic scale that it made news. That is why I had such a deep curiousity to understand it. I appreciate your clarification on game ban vs VAC bans though. Truly thank you.
This was recent wasn't it? I recall many writing about it in the forums and online. It was horrible but I believe they are retroactively correcting it at some point if it hasn't been corrected already. However the damage is done for some of these users despite it being common place. People who see this assume the worst instead of listening to the person. Truly a tragedy..
Because AMD is actively altering the DLLs on the fly. Vac is responding exactly as it should to such behavior.
Yup, according to Valve they are unbanning these people. Must be a long list since that game is pretty popular.
He is reiterating that regardless the cause there are fails in the system that can have adverse affects on many many people in the community and should not be taken lightly. (Not that it has been). These issues can sometimes cost people great business or even trust in a otherwise already difficult to earn trust system let alone world. The counter to that was 99% of the time it doesn't. That one % is unholy though... and the affects are damaging.
that's so old it's hilarious... might as well download more ram and send a nigerian prince 10 grand while you're at it.
No, VAC should be able to detect what software is "altering the DLLs on the fly."
If that's being caused by your gpu driver, then obviously the player is not cheating...
??
Please read the article. No one tried to download anything.
I don't believe it was a hack from what I read. It was part of AMD's new software update of sorts and with the feature enabled automatically I am sure many were affected. It wasn't as though they went and downloaded a hack otherwise long ago they would have been banned for much more damning hacks.
You are assuming people read...