安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
cutscenes felt like fillers and was boring since they just had no hype at all to enjoy.
like there is prob other stuff too i missed but it just felt so cookie cutter.
i love 2 so much cause handsome jack acted like a ceo. the war chief and ceo in 3 were just so weak chars, they pushed them so hard to be relatable and nice and soft and what not. i guess i really wanted stronger chars but they wanted to be more appealing to the new gen idk really what they were thinking.
when i think of borderlands 3 i just remember when they cared more about who was in the game then the actual story itself, if the story was good i would not care but they never cared about the story, they wanted to include everyone instead.