Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
What we refer to now as “scientific discovery” was once interpreted as a coincidence. Why does the sun, light, always appear and disappear in the same places in the sky? Why does it always become very hot and dry, then very cold and wet? Why do all these creatures from different parts of the world look and act so much the same? Why do all members of a species share just one of two, distinct appearances?
That’s all that a coincidence is: a sequence of events that, when observed critically, seem to suggest something deeper that what is seen on the surface. And were they to not exist, it’d be a far more difficult task to figure out our surroundings. We wouldn’t have clocks and calendars if the sun and seasons could happen whenever and wherever they please. We wouldn’t have a theory of evolution or a means to identify biological sexes if every organism could look and act in any manner it so desired.
And just like how the people that came long before us didn’t comprehend the meaning of these discoveries, I firmly believe that there exists coincidences in the universe that explain things we don’t fully understand either. I’m not someone who looks at the world and says, “There’s no deeper meaning behind that. It’s that way because it just chooses to be so.”