hottest trans girl

[Faster With Feeling]

Who would you vote for?

[Grynn]

Publicado originalmente por Goose:

...and have very clear meanings.

Says who?

[Goose]

Publicado originalmente por Grynn:

Publicado originalmente por Goose:

...and have very clear meanings.

Says who?

says just about everybody who understands what prefixes are.

[Grynn]

Publicado originalmente por Goose:

Publicado originalmente por Grynn:

Says who?

says just about everybody who understands what prefixes are.

I see.

[Goose]

Publicado originalmente por Grynn:

Publicado originalmente por Goose:

says just about everybody who understands what prefixes are.

I see.

glad i could clear that up.

[Not Big Surprise]

Publicado originalmente por Grynn:

Publicado originalmente por Goose:

...and have very clear meanings.

Says who?

skill issue
they're pretty easy to figure out if you have even the slightest idea where the different parts of those words come from

[Goose]

Publicado originalmente por Not Big Surprise:

Publicado originalmente por Grynn:

Says who?

skill issue
they're pretty easy to figure out if you have even the slightest idea where the different parts of those words come from

^

i never had to google it/be told what they mean, i just read the word, saw the context, broke it down and went from there.

i'm convinced people who complain about our "goofy made up words" genuinely lack reading comprehension.

[lsdninja]

I remember learning about cis and trans isomers in high school organic chemistry 25-odd years ago…

[Goose]

Publicado originalmente por lsdninja:

I remember learning about cis and trans isomers in high school organic chemistry 25-odd years ago…

its the exact same prefix style.

[Pronoun Paladin ☯]

Publicado originalmente por reaper:

Publicado originalmente por Not Big Surprise:

cisgender and heterosexual
cisgender being the opposite of transgender, and heterosexual being, well, i think you know that


basically a shorter way to talk about someone who's straight and cis

Why do we need a convoluted term such as this to describe a traditional human???? :cleanseal:

Because words like "normal" destroy their narrative.

Also please note words like "cis" are used most of the time when the trans or LGQB community are trying to be mean and hurtful so much so that "cis" is a recognized slur word used against normal people.

[krag hag]

Publicado originalmente por Snow ☯:

Because words like "normal" destroy their narrative.

Also please note words like "cis" are used most of the time when the trans or LGQB community are trying to be mean and hurtful so much so that "cis" is a recognized slur word used against normal people.

Is straight a slur too? Or white?

[Pronoun Paladin ☯]

Publicado originalmente por Erin:

Publicado originalmente por Snow ☯:

Because words like "normal" destroy their narrative.

Also please note words like "cis" are used most of the time when the trans or LGQB community are trying to be mean and hurtful so much so that "cis" is a recognized slur word used against normal people.

Is straight a slur too? Or white?

Nope, just the new made-up word that the activists communities used in so many vile situation to exclude people that it was quickly recognized as a slur.

[krag hag]

Publicado originalmente por Snow ☯:

Nope, just the new made-up word that the activists communities used in so many vile situation to exclude people that it was quickly recognized as a slur.

I love how dudes like you call us snowflakes and at the same time freak out about a harmless term for cisgender heterosexual people

[Pronoun Paladin ☯]

Publicado originalmente por Erin:

Publicado originalmente por Snow ☯:

Nope, just the new made-up word that the activists communities used in so many vile situation to exclude people that it was quickly recognized as a slur.

I love how dudes like you call us snowflakes and at the same time freak out about a harmless term for cisgender heterosexual people

It's not really harmless, it creates a foot-hold for the entire ideology and it dictates the words we're going to use and those words become the foundation for our opinions.

By labeling it "cis" you're automatically giving the trans-activists ground and enabling them to build off that. Consider how with the use of "cis" they're able to re-define what it means to be man or woman...because the "man or women" they're talking about isn't a "cis-man or cis-woman"

And yet if you don't give these activists any ground and refuse to use their words, then their narrative becomes much less powerful.

It's one of the reasons I don't like saying "gender affirming care" which is their words and by that simple phrase your building the entire narrative about blocking someone who just seeks to affirming care, makes you sound like a jerk fro not supporting it. Hence why I call it sex changes. It's a very sterile word that removes the emotional manipulation from the phrase.

[Not Big Surprise]

Publicado originalmente por Snow ☯:

Publicado originalmente por Erin:

I love how dudes like you call us snowflakes and at the same time freak out about a harmless term for cisgender heterosexual people

It's not really harmless, it creates a foot-hold for the entire ideology and it dictates the words we're going to use and those words become the foundation for our opinions.

By labeling it "cis" you're automatically giving the trans-activists ground and enabling them to build off that. Consider how with the use of "cis" they're able to re-define what it means to be man or woman...because the "man or women" they're talking about isn't a "cis-man or cis-woman"

And yet if you don't give these activists any ground and refuse to use their words, then their narrative becomes much less powerful.

It's one of the reasons I don't like saying "gender affirming care" which is their words and by that simple phrase your building the entire narrative about blocking someone who just seeks to affirming care, makes you sound like a jerk fro not supporting it. Hence why I call it sex changes. It's a very sterile word that removes the emotional manipulation from the phrase.

in other words, treating "cis" as a slur is rooted in transphobia

[Pronoun Paladin ☯]

Publicado originalmente por Not Big Surprise:

Publicado originalmente por Snow ☯:

It's not really harmless, it creates a foot-hold for the entire ideology and it dictates the words we're going to use and those words become the foundation for our opinions.

By labeling it "cis" you're automatically giving the trans-activists ground and enabling them to build off that. Consider how with the use of "cis" they're able to re-define what it means to be man or woman...because the "man or women" they're talking about isn't a "cis-man or cis-woman"

And yet if you don't give these activists any ground and refuse to use their words, then their narrative becomes much less powerful.

It's one of the reasons I don't like saying "gender affirming care" which is their words and by that simple phrase your building the entire narrative about blocking someone who just seeks to affirming care, makes you sound like a jerk fro not supporting it. Hence why I call it sex changes. It's a very sterile word that removes the emotional manipulation from the phrase.

in other words, treating "cis" as a slur is rooted in transphobia

Not at all...a phobia is an irrational fear or irrational hatred of transsexuals, and I'm rejecting bad science that encourages body negativity, not trans-folk.

I even said that I find Blaire White, who is a transsexual to be attractive, that's a pretty good sign I'm probably not transphobic. I am BSphobic. I'm super afraid of bad arguments and BS.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyzZ3J6IG6s&t=156s