Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Assault on Wall Street is a pretty decent action film, imo. Nothing deep nor revolutionary, but decent.
I read that he got all his financing through some tax loophole, but I never understood how putting money in a movie that makes no money can earn you anything, even if its tax deductabile.
Wolfenstein terrifies me sometimes.
♥♥♥♥ yeah!
Wrote his dissertation about "Die Gattung Serie und ihre Genres" (The Genus of Series and its Genres). Is a doctor of literature sciences. Makes sense, given that he is working in film.
Boll was definitely the right bloke for that job.
part of some cultural film industry stimulus initiative i believe, intended to bolster german film making but ending up essentially paying people to make sub-par movies instead.
once the loophole was closed he would have to deliver movies that actually make a profit in order to see a return of investment, and i believe it was around that time he left the business.
People have been trying to figure out if his movies are a means to tax evade/write offs for studios.
Apparently, he heavily relied on subsidies and tax loopholes for funding in the past. Canada and Germany in particular, where most of his films are made, are kinda infamous for heavily subsidising the film industry to unreasonable degrees.