Instalar o Steam
Iniciar sessão
|
Idioma
简体中文 (Chinês Simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês Tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol de Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol da América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Brasil)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar problema de tradução
Once you understand the differences, then there's no need to hamstring yourself with Manjaro anyway.
That's a big part of how Windows keeps people upgrading and buying new software. Want to play the latest Windows games? You need the latest DirectX. But then they tie that to OS releases, like forcing people to get 10 for DX12. As well as ending support for them to force people to go to newer ones which may not be better.
At least with Linux, I don't have to deal with any of that crap.
last time i use linux (i use a laptop with windows. it's for school project. can't go back to my main pc because this laptop rocks hard while can't install linux because my brother won't let me to), it's so great. my personal linux of choice is eos (endeavouros). because it's so damn good. the update is easier, everything is snappy. it's good
as of gaming, it's good by far. although my hardware is not strong which i can't blame linux itself. however, i try to play csgo and i just can't for some reason.
what about the bad? some of a very good/essential software like office 365 either don't work or need a lot of tinkering. sure, it may be microsoft but it's that good
For a normal desktop/laptop
Idk I’m waiting to see how windows 12 turns out
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3040336094
Every distribution has their advantages and their disadvantages. People should use whichever one is most suitable for them or for the task at hand.
TL;DR: If someone is happy using Manjaro, leave them be. That is their choice.
I just hope I don't have to learn to type commands again. I haven't had to do that since the days of DOS 6.2 and Commodore 64, as a casual, non-programming end-user.
And Linux, from what little I've seen, is full of commands that make no damn sense in English.
Like "PRINT" means, in a sane, normal operating system or language, you know, "print".
Does what it says on the tin.
I saw the Linux version of that command once, and I turned around and shut the door, broke the key off in the lock, and walked away.
1 Create a new file called hello.sh using a text editor such as nano or vi/vim.
2 Add the following code to the file: #!/bin/bash echo "Hello, World!"
3 Set the script executable permission by running chmod command: $ chmod -v +x hello.sh
4 Run or execute the script using any one of the following syntax: $ ./hello.sh OR $ sh hello.sh OR $ bash hello.sh
Alternatively, you can use the echo command to write the string to a file: sudo echo -e 'Hello, World! nThis is PNAP!' >> test.txt
This is why people won't switch. This right here.
Not:
10 Print "Hello World!"
RUN
I think the userbase likes it that way, because they don't *want* everyone to switch. If everyone switched to Linux, then Linux is what most of the malware would me made for. So lets keep it arcane, obscure, and nigh unusable to anyone without a four-shelf stack of books.
That's my theory. And it makes sense, in a way. Who wants malware, right?
You are taking a bit of a stretch though and trying to over complicate things. If you really want a shell file with one line you can do so as follows:
File contents (named anything, no file extension necessary):
To run said file:
This way you don't need to set execution permissions nor include the shebang. You only need those when you wish to have the program directly launchable.
Although, you don't need sudo at all in any case for your example.