Installer Steam
Logg inn
|
språk
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (tradisjonell kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tsjekkisk)
Dansk (dansk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spania)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latin-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (gresk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (nederlandsk)
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasil)
Română (rumensk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et problem med oversettelse
Diskusjonsregler og retningslinjer
Rapporter dette innlegget
We hear talk about how America was somehow built on slaves backs (it wasn't) but because it was, we need to tear down the whole system.
Or we hear about how we need to defund the police because some forms of police using in Democrats states used to also be slave catchers.
Does historical significance no longer matter?
And even if it doesn't. Eugenics is the practice of rearranging human population to create the perfect human or eliminate social ills. It's that last part we should focus on....social ills...well crap a good chunk of the various arguments of why we should accept abortion argue that it would help eliminate social ills. Lower poverty. The baby would be too expensive for the parent...those are all eugenics arguments.
ANd as for books I'm not interested in your whataboutism of likely pointing to the bible as somethign that has sex in it...yes the bible does, but the bibles specific purpose isn't to introduce kids to sex, which is what these gender ideologies do.
see that would be a good point if abortion was something enforced upon populations
but since it's merely offered as an alternative for those who would rather not have another kid at that point in time, can you really say it's eugenics?
i never mentioned the bible?
i mean, there are pretty explicit depictions of sex in the bible, but bringing that up wouldn't illustrate the point i'm making
my point is, the book doesn't introduce kids to sex any more than snowwhite or cinderella do
If you slap the name LGQBT rights in front of whatever someone wants to push including bad science like gender ideology, this group will fight for those rights.
This is why I think Republicans should start claiming Democrats are trying to remove gay rights...what rights are those? Oh the right for a gay person to own an AR-15 of course.
This comment was brought to you by the letter "C"
C is for "coming out"
If you support the vaccine, please check the stats record low trust from black and latinos in this government healthcare initiative. And part of that distrusts comes from events like what we're discussing.
As for willing abortion vs forced abortions, you have a point however research the N-word project by Margaret Sangers, the point was to make abortions readily available to certain communities and to this day abortion clnics are largely in certain communities over others.
That will cause a form of eugenics whether it's intentional or not.
And the entire book is about sex. The GAYBC's....a form of sex is in the very name of the book and every topic in the book talks about some form of introduction to sexual topics. I find that often people are too close to the topic.
"gay" doesn't exclusively refer to sexual attraction
yes, i know, it's called "sexuality"
but when you look past semantics and into the concepts themselves, you find out that a gay couple for instance can be a romantic gay couple
saying that talking about gayness is talking about sex is like saying talking about straightness is talking about sex
it simply makes no sense when you know even a little bit about the subject
Anything that focuses on immutable characteristics or identity characteristics are going to encourage narcissism and we have alot of it in our society. People identifying as their race, gender, or sexual orientation and building their entire identities over it.
As for leaving the "closet" that doesn't truly happen. One leaves the closet for one thing only to enter another closet. Notice my previous definition included "encourage people to think of themselves as victims to encourage a self-sealing social network that requires these folks to toe the line as far as voting patterns"
That's key.
And that's something that you see. There are trans-women who reject the ideology that we frequently discuss, and they are often ostracized from a community that claims love and tolerance.
And don't take this as poking the bear just for fun, I would like to see a kinder, more caring, more tolerant and healthier community
It can mean "happy" which is what it used to mean a long time ago. But in the modern era gay is a form of sexual attraction. And gay in terms of the title of the book is to "educate/indoctrinate" kids into this "culture"
And I see what you're saying about "gay" but I see it as a preference not some great building block for a completely different people. It's like saying I like Chocolate Ice Cream and you like Strawberry. And it's a preference that are "abnormal" hence "C" is for coming out.
Let kids find the abnormal stuff on their own time instead of learning about it and then deciding to be that thing...when they really aren't that thing.
Kids are stupid and they are highly influenced by things around them and are notorious for making bad choices or choices which wouldn't really fit them.
I hated my name as a kid, and I one day went to my parents wanting to change my name to "Super" they denied my identity and didn't allow my name change.
You're missing the point of what the book is doing.
This kind of book will cause confusion and psychological problems for kids. What has drag got to do with a 3-year-old? The fact that drag is in there is a red flag. Out of everything appropriate for kids, such as colours, teaching different kinds of fruit (innocent things for kids), drag is there. Telling boys to put on girls' clothes. Like, why? It's obviously going to cause confusion. He'll put on girls' clothes, pretend he's a girl, perhaps like it too much and wish he was a girl. Then what happens? "I like pretending to be a girl, it's fun. Hmm. What if I am a girl but born in the wrong body?".
How are you unable to see why this is a problem?
Then this boy grows up confused which leads to puberty blockers, HRT, surgery.
Like, no responsible, sane parent wants their child to turn out trans because then their child will have to go through the issues trans people go through.
What if a child gets confused about gender because of gender ideology taught to them? Like, what if that child would've turned out normal if we left them alone and didn't put ideas in their head?
We want kids to turn out normal/healthy(no problems), as normal as we can get them because that's best for them.
Yes, some kids, without gender ideology taught to them, will get confused about gender. It's unfortunate but why should that mean we should be putting ideas in the heads of all the other kids which aren't confused about gender?
Like, do you actually think a kid can't be confused into thinking they're the wrong gender? They can. And that's what this book risks doing. I'd say it's intentionally doing it by planting the ideas to begin with.
People don't want the risk, mate.
and no, accepting you're queer doesn't make it hard or impossible to understand others, nor does it make you dismiss their emotions
people don't "build their entire identities over it"
these things simply are a part of who we are
also not all of them are necessary immutable per-se, but judging by your stances you are absolutely not ready for that conversation
not really
it's more so a mix of a few things
the world being pretty much centered around, say, cis people, in a way that ignores and often excludes trans people
there are small societal changes that could be done that would benefit us without really impacting everyone else much if at all
things like a deeper understanding of gender, or potentially asking people how they'd prefer to be referred to like we do with names
and no, you don't have to "toe the line as for voting patterns"
just don't vote the party that has dedicated itself to spreading transphobic rhetoric for the entire year so far
just don't be a grifter lmao
idk i think it's pretty healthy when you ignore the blatant misrepresentations made by chuds and people who want to be "the good ones"
i would say unusual
still, i think it would be much better if they learned about things in controlled environments rather than having to rely on the internet to find out why they "can't stop liking the wrong gender", or ending up thinking that if you don't fall in line you're a weirdo
also idk, something about your overall behavior over time gives me some disbelief in your story
see that's the thing, kids who feel those sorts of things, usually are trans
trying to hide or demonize our existence won't change that— all it'll do is cause confusion, potentially years of self-hatred, and eventually the shattering of your kid's trust in you
learning about these subjects is precisely what will prevent confusion, whether it is because the kids are queer or simply see queer people
see the funny thing is, trying to provide an accepting environment for trans people where we can transition, has time and time again been shown to be beneficial for our mental health, and conversely trying to put up roadblocks to it tends to be pretty harmful
anyway, i'm surprised that as a bi person you don't recognize the rhetoric you're using here
i wasn't around for things like the aids epidemic, the stonewall riots, or the severe demonizing of queer people during the latter half of the last century; but even still, it's easy for me to see that all the talking points you're using would have been used against you back in the day
If you wanna discuss the issue you have to be honest and specific about what is being asked, by you or otherwise, not just drive everything ever asked into a tiny little phrase that you can package as some absolute goods without consequence.
I agree that, for some, transitioning saves lives.
However, shouldn't we be trying to prevent people from turning out trans to begin with?
Like, why would you want to put ideas in a person's head that could confuse them and cause gender dysphoria? It's harmful.
Like, the responsible thing to do is try and prevent it, not encourage it.