Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
The baby scene still haunts me, like why did they have to do that ♥♥♥♥ that was outrageous.
The second one is so edgy that it gets annoying and boring. I get the feeling the director thinks he's making something really clever but it's just ♥♥♥♥.
i barely managed to finish the 1st. i never ever went for the 2nd.
and i loved most of Saws too. if they can be compared.
wow i'm royally stunned
most weird villain ever. idek how to categorize that guy. is he a villain in the first place? idk.
haven't seen X yet though. no spoilers.
Edit: I don't think his whole "appreciate life" idea ever stuck with the survivors of his traps and experiments. Amanda even failed his test in the end, and Hoffman went rogue.
this is really true. that whole appreciate life idea of his always stopped me from clearly categorizing him as a villain. but then all his survivors would say otherwise. yeah in that sense he's clearly a villain. with others it was easier, he was the only one that puzzled me.
Then you get 54 ♥♥♥♥ sequels.
The character in 2 is disturbing. Like, so conveniently played I had to make sure they didn't pick a guy for the part based on his psychiatric background alone.
It is NOT a good movie. It is a WELL played part.
Yeah that was ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. I can imagine the producer saying "how bout we kill a baby? Guys? Guys? No, serious guys, let's kill a baby."