安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Pearl Harbour was a well defended military installation. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were full of civilians. The bomber which delivered the A-bomb was flying way above the maximum reach of Japanese Zeke/Cero fighters. Japanese torpedo planes were attacking battleships which returned fire. The B-29s which dropped the bombs on women and children were unopposed.
Edit: Pearl Harbour was also an attack which Japan was goaded into by an economic embargo imposed by the US, as you may have read in this very thread.
That's why they are soldiers. They put on their uniforms and took up arms to take lives or lay them down. A perfectly needless profession for a species which has developed a working brain to find ways to solve problems beyond such savagery as is any act of violence. Humans should be ashamed of war.
No media will ever do justice to it's abhorrence.
Humanity at it's cruelest is horror unfathomable.
Or, you could nuke the water near Japan, or an island close to it, and say, "if you do not surrender, you will experience the temperature of 1,000 sun's in an instant. Thousands will die instantly"
Walk softly but carry a large stick.
No one warned Japan. Seemed like overkill revenge for Pearl Harbor.
The thing is that both bombs dropped were different in their uses, little boy and fat man. Little boy was dropped on a parashoot and was so weak its blast radius was only five miles, it was a warning to tell the Japanese "You have 3 days to surrender" which was honored by parking a vast majority of the US naval forces on the coast line just out of artillery reach in plain sight of the Japanese military. After 3 days of no response and continued attempts to shoot the ships, the US dropped the other, far more destructive fatman bomb that wiped out a city.
You see, even WHEN WE USED THE FIRST NUKE, Japan didnt surrender, so the invasion would of been nothing when you take in that they were not scared that a new local 5 mile empty zone was created after a bomb fell, it took the second, much more powerful bomb to finally force some logic into their heads.
The US actually had plans to completely obliterate Japan if they didnt surrender, the fact is they didnt go forward with that plan as they put on display to the Soviets that, while their equally as destructive as them, they can be reasoned with and end a war before more blood is shed.
Also even of no bombs were used in WW2 they would have been used at a later date and probably at a larger yield, and it would have been harder to justify them not becoming a precedent rather then something used to end a war that was worse then anything seen before with an unprecedented amount of international cooperation.
"In the summer of 1945, the U.S. Army Air Force carried out one of the most intense campaigns of city destruction in the history of the world. Sixty-eight cities in Japan were attacked and all of them were either partially or completely destroyed. An estimated 1.7 million people were made homeless, 300,000 were killed, and 750,000 were wounded. Sixty-six of these raids were carried out with conventional bombs, two with atomic bombs."
"The first of the conventional raids, a night attack on Tokyo on March 9-10, 1945, remains the single most destructive attack on a city in the history of war. Something like 16 square miles of the city were burned out. An estimated 120,000 Japanese lost their lives—the single highest death toll of any bombing attack on a city."
"We often imagine, because of the way the story is told, that the bombing of Hiroshima was far worse. We imagine that the number of people killed was off the charts. But if you graph the number of people killed in all 68 cities bombed in the summer of 1945, you find that Hiroshima was second in terms of civilian deaths. If you chart the number of square miles destroyed, you find that Hiroshima was fourth. If you chart the percentage of the city destroyed, Hiroshima was 17th. Hiroshima was clearly within the parameters of the conventional attacks carried out that summer."
Here just fkn read it yourself:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/05/30/the-bomb-didnt-beat-japan-stalin-did/
We already went over the fire bombing and how the first bomb was indeed a warning to surrender, its called Force-A-Surrender and has been used throughout history long before the nuclear weapons were even invented.