Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
Regole e linee guida per le discussioni
Segnala questo messaggio
Gee, I wonder where all that money came from. Do you think this is the first and only time Joe Biden has taken a bribe? And none of this justifies the fact he got caught taken bribes. And not just taking bribes, but taking them from our largest adversary.
On the contrary... nobody is worried about Biden... he's pretty well done no matter what happens
But yes... it would be funny to watch the "democrats" pull themselves apart not being able to choose someone else... that would be funny at least
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/live-updates/biden-impeachment-inquiry-live-updates/?id=103530653
Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor and REPUBLICAN WITNESS, said in his opening statement he didn't believe impeachment articles against President Biden were warranted at this time.
"I want to emphasize what it is that we're here today for," he said. "This is a question of an impeachment inquiry. It is not a vote on articles of impeachment. In fact, I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment. That is something that inquiry has to establish."
Sounds just like when they tried to impeach Trump... oh well good try though, next time it will work
Why's that? You need both a passing vote in the house and the senate to fully impeach a president.
Innocent until proven guilty, as always.
Biden has consistently maintained the position that his son's business dealings and money have nothing to do with him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6pfUJlr3Os
That ♥♥♥♥ don't work anymore.
Oh alright then...
Well in October 2017, Hunter Biden had committed to invest approximately $420,000 USD (as of 10/12/2019) to acquire a 10% equity position in BHR, which he still holds. Therefore Hunter Biden reportedly sat on the board of directors of BHR Partners.
Ms. Wang Xin wire transfer $10,000 from BHR labeled as "ACC/LOAN TO BENEFICIARY" on July 26, 2019 and later on Aug. 2, 2019 was for $250,000 from Li Xiang Sheng, by the CEO of BHR Partners.
Hunter resigned from the board of BHR at the end of October 2019.
In 2020, Joe Biden told Americans that his family never received money from China.
So the concept is that Hunter didn't do an investment with BHR, which Joe might of not even known about, but rather it's China funding the US election corruption?
Kinda like how Russia actually has a Swedish off-shore bank account which was linked to Trump during the US election?
Do they know that Trump has even more investments than the Bidens do in China too?
China paid Trump at least $5.4 Million ... again Joe Biden needs some catching up to do in the money laundering corruption department... and using his son to do so. Rolls eyes.
You know what's more amusing? Looking up the 100+ trademarks Trump has registered in China! 35 of those trademarks he got done when he was the US president. No wonder why he keeps saying China, China, China...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDrfE9I8_hs
Not at all. Dems were organized and their inquiry was procedural. If you'll keep track of the live updates, you'll see Republicans are currently "Who has what? Who said this? Do you have it? I don't have it. He has it. Doesn't he?"
lololol