Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
The invisible hand of the market at hand, nothing stupid about people willing to pay money to be entertained.
You could say the same then about almost anything that involves just watching - TV, film or even opera.
if we are talking about big leagues then yes it is, people invest millions of dollars into players, coaches, training equipment, stadiums, ect. there are jobs and careers that should earn more money than just entertaining people
Spacelord can't fathom why people want to watch sports more than play them.
Fork said for the same reason they watch things on tv/movies.
I said anyone can technically play a sport, but not end up in most situations portrayed on tv and film.
You mistook what I said thinking I meant professional sports.
I tried to explain on the core level sports can be played and that is basically the same thing the pros play, but the only way a common person can experience most movie/tv situations is by pretending make believe.
What is this about? I was responding to the guy saying that sports are a big business, but so is nearly every form of audience entertainment.
No, not everyone could be a professional athlete.