Εγκατάσταση Steam
Σύνδεση
|
Γλώσσα
简体中文 (Απλοποιημένα κινεζικά)
繁體中文 (Παραδοσιακά κινεζικά)
日本語 (Ιαπωνικά)
한국어 (Κορεατικά)
ไทย (Ταϊλανδικά)
Български (Βουλγαρικά)
Čeština (Τσεχικά)
Dansk (Δανικά)
Deutsch (Γερμανικά)
English (Αγγλικά)
Español – España (Ισπανικά – Ισπανία)
Español – Latinoamérica (Ισπανικά – Λατινική Αμερική)
Français (Γαλλικά)
Italiano (Ιταλικά)
Bahasa Indonesia (Ινδονησιακά)
Magyar (Ουγγρικά)
Nederlands (Ολλανδικά)
Norsk (Νορβηγικά)
Polski (Πολωνικά)
Português (Πορτογαλικά – Πορτογαλία)
Português – Brasil (Πορτογαλικά – Βραζιλία)
Română (Ρουμανικά)
Русский (Ρωσικά)
Suomi (Φινλανδικά)
Svenska (Σουηδικά)
Türkçe (Τουρκικά)
Tiếng Việt (Βιετναμικά)
Українська (Ουκρανικά)
Αναφορά προβλήματος μετάφρασης
Κανόνες συζητήσεων και οδηγίες
Αναφορά ανάρτησης
Yes- and probably visa-versa.
Plus it isn't a stretch(no pun intended) that if the absence of a universe is (a) singularity- then perhaps inflation could partially/fully be explained by expanding into an outwards singularity?
Edit:
Adding in the visual of changing the perspective.
Imagine blowing bubbles in a vacuum chamber. That is one way of viewing universes coming into being and expanding. When they pop, all the material just gets put back into the bubbler.
For example, the bible was considered evidence that the earth is flat due to verses mentioning it "hanging" and having "corners" and whatnot back when that was the prevailing theory, but once the world was discovered to not be flat, the interpretation changed to fit it. That's not evidence of it being scientifically correct, that's refitting vague descriptions that could be attributed either way.
Another is the idea that thoughts and emotions come from the heart and not the brain, which is prevalent throughout the book. This was taken literally until biology caught up and figured out it was the brain that did that stuff, then suddenly the "heart" became metaphorical.
Then there's smaller nitpicks like the mustard seed not being the smallest seed, and the claim that "dragons" were actually referring to dinosaurs despite the description not fitting, and that the "fish" that swallowed jonah was actually a whale.
It does get some things right though, the order of stuff coming into existence in genesis is mostly right except for the whole "day and night without the sun" and the moon being a "light" in and of itself. It did pick up that there was stars, then the world went from mostly water to having land, then we went from sea creatures to land ones and birds, then people. And it did mention to quarantine the sick away from everyone else to prevent disease from spreading and had a few bits of proper hygiene instruction.
The Bible is actually a very late compilation from a lot of different sources. Then add in the whole made-up exile in Egypt just to confuse things.
To be clear, Southern Israel WAS enslaved by Egypt, but they never went to Egypt, they were enslaved in-place. The exile to Egypt was added later as the Canaanites became Jews so the Jews could say "We are not of these Canaanite people, we are foreigners who took this land of Canaan by Divine Right."
And that whole context was used to join a lot of disjointed books. Then they were all rewritten during to Deuteronomic Reform of Kong Josiah to reflect a monotheistic view, as before this point the text was polytheistic (some polytheistic verses still remain. Example: Psalm 82:6).
The Flood was real, but it isn't how you envision it. About 12,000 years ago the glaicers melted and receeded at the end of the last ice age. This rose the sea levels rapidly. At one point, it may have been rising at around 8 meters PER DAY.
Early human settlements were almost always near water, so this would have been catastrophic for our earliest societies. Where we pick up the story is in Uruk, the first real city humans ever built.
The Sumerians of Uruk tell us that a people fleeing a flood that swallowed their whole world taught them the trades of math, cultivation, engineering, law, and so on. Basically, they brought society with them.
Their language is what's known as a 'language isolate', meaning there's no other languages related to it. Whoever these people were, they fled a long way into a strange land, and there began our civilization.
So of course stories about a global flood persist all across the world: it happened! Just not the 40 days and 40 nights way.
Generally, most consider the bronze age to have started right at the end of the last major ice age.
So imagine ancient people living in a fertile flood plain such as what is now the Persian Gulf.
The storms start, the wall of ice holding the rising oceans breaks and suddenly unimaginable volumes of water come rushing in!
To those people how could they have thought anything other than the "gods" were angry and the whole world was flooding?
To them that was the whole world!
As history and science goes, the Bible fails on both counts. Its a shame so many good books were destroyed or lost, and yet this pile of dogmatic crap persists like a fart in an elevator that lingers forever.
Exclaimed the furry.
Have you ever read any of Lucian of Samosata? Great sci-fi writer, that fella.
Checkmate.
I'm a solipsist.
simple, unlike the 20 page long essays full of nothing but theoretical information. why do you complicate things so much when you'll just come to the same answer in the end?