Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
the discussion abt game preservation thing has nothing to do with dolphin either
and regarding dolphin, they intergrate wii common keys in their app. that sht will get them troubles
But from a preservation standpoint 100 years from now the copyright will be gone, and video game historians will be playing and recommending, some of the best games of all time, maybe.
software is pretty much obsolete after 15 years or are you still using quicken and netscape
So it's an emulator? I mean, someone can just make one with a raspberry pi if they want to, what's stopping Nintendo from stopping people making pcb's
We had two cases from Sony. The Bleem case was the second one, and it was over patents and screenshots, not the B.I.O.S. Bleem won, but it was a Pyrrhic victory since the time and money spent fighting the case sunk 'em. They helped established precedent that would render future cases easier, but that wasn't of much direct use to them.
The first case was Sony vs. Connectix[www.gamespot.com], and that was over the B.I.O.S., among other things such as trademark infringement. The decision in Sony v. Connectix was basically that since Connectix reverse engineered the functionality of the B.I.O.S. that no infringement occurred. I think there might've been some commentary on how they might've even been able to use the real B.I.O.S. in the opinion of the court but since that fact was not relevant to the case, it constitutes dictum that does not set binding precedent.
These are both ninth circuit court of appeals cases, so they are not nation-wide binding, but most copyright cases are jurisdiction shopped to the ninth circuit because they are biased towards interpertingt the laws more strictly than other jurisdictions. This is mostly because the ninth circuit covers the entire west coast, most especially including California with Silicon Valley and Hollywood, but also Redmond Washington where Microsoft, Nintendo of America and Valve are based. Plenty of of the tax dollars which help fund the courts are at stake are in the 9th circuit. The fact that the little guy won in both cases is actually somewhat surprising to me.
It is worth noting that Connectix doesn't exist anymore either though. Sony bought 'em out after losing to suppress the Virtual Gamestation emulator they made.
Here's a video that mentions it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tj9CDNaMTQU&t=50s
He starts talking about it at around 3:00.