Installer Steam
Logg inn
|
språk
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (tradisjonell kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tsjekkisk)
Dansk (dansk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spania)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latin-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (gresk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (nederlandsk)
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasil)
Română (rumensk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et problem med oversettelse
Bugs have multiple weaknesses, so does steel. But combine them for bug/steel?
Fire is the only thing you have to worry about.
See, this is where I have to rely on the good people of OT to help me. I'm going with your choice, Irene - totally blind. But I've got faith you have the right instinct.
But mono vs dual typing doesn't mean much within pokemon in terms of move efficiency. A monotype fire pokemon is just as good with fire moves as a dual typed fire/flying pokemon is. There isn't really a "mastery" that comes with being monotype like Irene's thinking.
I imagine things are probably fairly balanced in Pokémon - which is why people can have favorites and not feel stupid for picking the wrong favorite.
Still, I like focued power. Otherwise you're a jack of all trades, master of none.
Definitely water type. Once a little ♥♥♥♥ Squirtle, now a grown ass Blastoise and you mofos gotta deal with it :P
:hydropump: does not exist :(
Lmao even
Pokemon is a game of many things, but balanced is not one of them
If I compose a multitype team I'm actually expanding the roster of viable opponents rather than limiting them, ultimately opening myself up to obscure compositions which only work against multitypes.
Heh. Like I said, I'm just going with Irene's answer.
Maybe you're right and dual elements are better.