Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
No idea. Nothing in your history talks about a VPN or using one.
So for plenty of them it's not a winning situation if they were to make it legal too. There's videos and articles about it laying around if you want to learn about it.
Me? I don't care, not one for the desires of flesh. Especially with some stranger doing their rounds with 6 or more people daily.
OK so now I'm going to tell you that you can make 10 bucks an hour in a factory, or 100 bucks an hour by painting. If you were decent at painting, and it was a choice available to you, would you be happy if some rando said you can't do it because they personally don't agree with it?
Wouldn't that be your choice to make?
There you go folks, obvious troll avoiding inconvenient questions.
Well done tho, you dragged it out this long.
You are failing to see he's using the logic you presented of "X or Y" which you seem to think is the case with sex work as you have previously expressed;
You presented that people would more likely become a prostitute than an engineer just because it's legal like those are the only two options or like those jobs are taking from the same pool of people.
It's a very black and white worldview that creates more problems then solves because it completely removes the nuances of human nature.
I will say, he isn't a troll.
Absolutely. My bad.
Your question about working a low paying job vs a higher paying sex job wasn't avoided either. I pointed out that there aren't just two options. The premise of your question was flawed.
The premise is based on how you presented that people will most likely do sex work over becoming and engineer if prostitution is legalized as if those are the only two options.
What's kinda funny is this could be very, very, roughly tied into the first conversation we ever had where you said congress shouldn't have term limits because is shows a lack of understanding of nuance which frequently happens with people who have been running the country for almost half their life. It creates a lack of understanding since they are no longer with everyone else but just stuck in their bubble.
You did respond, you avoided the question. You also changed my question then claimed it was flawed.
No one can argue with this lack of rationale. You're just always right.
If you believed water wasn't wet, you'd never take any other viewpoint.
There are many more options.
Like the option of sex work or engineer.
Those weren't the options and you know it. Confirmed troll, we're done here.
If it were a normal job, you could force people to do it.