安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
此主題的作者已將一篇留言標為問題解答。
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
There is far more to everyone outside of politics and 'what you like to do with your private parts', but somehow its become popular to believe these things take priority in the measure of a person.
It's lazy thinking. An inability to navigate an actual dialectical conversation. Social devolution.
As for initiating a fix: Worry about your community, not the entire world.
It is impossible to have legitimate empathy for and affect on the entire world vs the former.
The video claims only the revolutionary left is the real left… mkay, let's roll with that I guess?
The problem of revolutionary/extremist movements is that most people simply want certainty in their lives. Revolution is a big unknown with great risk and uncertainty for them and their loved ones.
People get killed in revolutions, that's the nature of them. And no sane person wants that unless their and their loved ones' lives are immediately threatened or they are out for revenge or (unfortunately) guaranteed profits.
Honestly, that the world isn't full of revolutionaries and ideologues, but most folks still see individual people when they walk about town, even when they disagree, is a good thing.
Though I can see how such mindset and naïvity can unfortunately lead to corruption and be abused by power-hungry loonies, which end up creating life-threatening situations either wilfully or through incompetence. But we are not there yet, and hopefully not soon.
If it´s about opposing capitalism as it is. I asked earlier here, if there´s another approach, but i haven´t got an answer. If You have one - i´m all ears, or eyes in that case...
As an individualist I recommend, that you should only focus on your own self-interest and perhaps family and friends, but only if you choose to deem them worthy.
Be a free-thinker.
I can not see it.
As an egoist You don´t need to care. Which means survival of the fittest. And to be successful You need to do it like the other successful people do it - or You´re exceptionally lucky or talented. Which harms individualism, as it´s more like how the people picture those left ideas, with the difference that it´s on a voluntary basis, because You always have the choice to be unsuccessful or poor. While ignoring that some people will be left behind no matter what, as they can´t keep up with the rest, even if they give everything they have.
He seems to think that leftism is the one and only thing anyone should believe in. That's not how the world works. You cannot be in constant revolution against everything at all times.
You have to be a reasonable human being. Which means accepting that there are people unlike you. With opinions you don't agree with.
The only real solution is to have everyone come to the center. Find common ground. Things we can all agree on. Leave the extremist views to the side.
Modern day politicians don't see it that way. It's extremism or nothing. Which is destroying society. Rapidly.
And "find common ground" doesn´t really work, when arguments and facts can easily be ignored - and You can´t really talk to the people, and questions You ask remain unanswered, and every petition is rejected with ridiculous arguments. That´s not how a democracy should work - but that´s how it works. And the thing the center does is either to say: "Oh no - these are Nazis, we can´t work with them." in best hopes the problems solves itself - or even worse, they try to adapt the same ideas, in the hopes to get these voters. That seems also insane to me.
False. He was talking about leftists talking to other leftists.
Not everyone here is EU. Some of us are U.S. or Australia.
Yes. Look at Japan. A tiny nation. They reject most immigration. Why? Because they already have an overpopulation problem. As does England and the U.S. This needs to STOP.
These people need to solve their own problems rather than bringing them to other countries to fix.
Significant evidence shows that climate change models are inaccurate. In the 1990's, people believed that NYC and LA would be underwater in 10 years due to global warming. They lied. These people have no idea what they are talking about.
The only thing insane is the denial that these sorts of people exist.
Most people are motivated by what is best for all. Some are motivated by what is best for themselves.
Regardless of ideology, you have to have the conversation. Otherwise? Authoritarians and fascists rein supreme. And nobody wants that.
What is "center" is a constantly shifting goal post for many... Once you arrive at what is determined to be a center, extremism returns, and the center is now somewhere between that point, and the new position by the extremists. You only have to look back over the past 20-30 years to see that clear shift. For example, at one point, even democrats in the US supported secure borders. Now they call anyone who supports that idea a racist.
That alongside the political parties with most resources / "contacts" with standard corporations or corporate media** or other "special interest groups" that don't promote the candidate that actually gives a damn about what affects the common citizen across the many cities on a country. Thus "promoting" the candidates that will return the "favor" after they get into office to keep the cycle going.
In short the new left needs to start a genuine grassroot movement on a local level and grow from there (of course making alliances with other local political parties that share common ground be it for the short/medium/long term ideas regarding how to improve the workers class living standards while keeping a balance with climate change).
Also get into the media game kinda like how Jacobin does but in a per city / state basis, and once the movement has gained enough momentum on a per country basis.
In the meanwhile the current situation might end up being even more pro-Corporations and even more pro-Bourgeoisie aka the so self-called "elites" will get even more benefits than they got at the moment.
With that being said, I really like the idea of direct democracy if well implemented it can significally speed up the outdated bureocracy some govts have, regarding the average citizen concerns might be (i.e. Universal Health Care, Housing, Minimal Wage, Inflation, Civil Rights, etc)
Here two videos with English subtitles:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8vVEbCquMw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoP_mSIHqTY
** A post-data video about Corporate media:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34LGPIXvU5M
Bonus videos about what double-speak is (one of the many tools Corporations, politicans, uber-rich folks, etc use), 1st video a short summary of 8:40 min; the second video is a 1989 C-SPAN Interview with William Lutz about doublespeak it's a 59:16 min video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Pk6Xb_BWew
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91ka2s9Ubs0
Also this "The New Left rightly struggled against bureaucracy and conservatism, but it failed to organize popular dissent into a new democratic mass party. That remains the key challenge for the Left. " from this article:
https://catalyst-journal.com/2023/03/the-left-needs-organizational-democracy
It's going to be an uphill battle of course given the current Robert Putnam's "Bowling Alone" situation, but I say there's hope.