安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
i also worry the game companies will too. I can see them charging more for higher res versions of the same game. of course people will pay for it, so why not. gamers love to be gouged and nickel and dimed. popularity of season passes/dlc/loot boxes already proves this.
ehhh. yea. i'm with you. lets do it !
I was told "NO", but maybe you'll have a different response?
Same response for Multi-Controller usage.
Then you could just pick the resolution packs you want. Same with audio and language packs too because they take up a ton of space.
I've noticed a few games here and there doing that too. I guess that from the developer's point of view the process of dividing this stuff can be a pita so most of them throw the entire pack at you.
If more games pick this as a standarized feature there's more possibilities for general optimization in the medium-long term.
Skyrim and Fallout 4 kind of inadvertently did this by including an extra "high res texture pack" as a separate free DLC. If you don't need the higher resolution textures, just don't download that DLC and you're golden.
Provide proof if you want us to believe you
Heresy, you make zero sense. And your going to make the game devs cry.