Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
De auteur van dit onderwerp heeft een bericht gemarkeerd als antwoord op zijn of haar vraag.
Regels en richtlijnen voor discussies
Dit bericht rapporteren
So you think that IQ is a static thing and that it is always correct?
If you had a test at a gym, it is most likely an unofficial one and most likely focus on very few aspects of your brains functionality, could be memory,
Fun note. Even Binet, did not actually believe you could pinpoint a single permanent level of intelligence with the psychometric instruments... intellence is just much to broad a spectrum, for it to be reduced to something as a number.
Factor in that just about any of these scale test (including stanford binet) is made for children and young ones.. they were used to see determinate, if children needed alternative learning or if they had specific issues within the 5 branches that the scales test..
All in all.. IQ test are unreliable and in many ways problematic to use alone (again they can be great for testing specific things, say we wanna test your working memory, well using a test, could actually help us showcase where you are atm (nothing is permenant, we could talk about neuroplasticitet here, if you wanted)
So you don´t know Gardner? While I think his theory have many issues as well, it is much more broad and a lot of school systems have adopted his take on intelligence and that is how they structure their entire system (most likely also your gym)
If you are American, there is a good chance, that if you had been to an actual test (not for fun in gym, but from an actual professional) you would have used the Wechsler scales and I reckon you would have been tested under WISC-V.
The problem with Wechsler is that it is extremely unreliable and often do more harm, than good, in regard to being used as an instrument to help people.. I would never, as in never, use a WISC-V on a high school student on the autism spectrum ie.. doing so would be asking for an unreliable test score... even with a neurotypical student, it would be unreliable overall, but might be alright for a few selected fields, as a marker <-- (note marker) to adress and help the student.
So if you had been tested with WISC-V. it would have been in either all or one of these.
Working Memory, processing speed, verbal comprehension and perceptual reasoning.
Now.. I don´t think the above could be meassured for a persons intelligecence, I do think it could be a helpful tool, when trying to help students. Ie. obviously if you have a low working memory, then it is rather important, that you have the right tools and support, to strive in the class room, something that is often overlooked in my opinion.
Just to be clear, when people talk Mensa, then you need to be tested in the Stanford–Binet scales and it has to be administered by Mansa. It is not something you can yourself or at school ie... I already said why I think Stanford-Binet is problematic and inaccurate as a tool for meassurement, but atleast if people talk about Mensa, but sure to understand, that it is rather restrictive and limited in what it tries to test.
I´ve seen students, that had low test scores on WISC and not just in one index but almost all.. but now as young adults, they are the top students at the university...
Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't realize that the thread's vitality was solely dependent on your personal assessment of its worth. Next time, I'll be sure to run my posts by you for approval :).
High IQ individuals usually have a inflated ego and sense of worth, along with having difficulties enjoying life. Always trying to prove something to someone.
It's ok to be philosophical but for the love of god step down to reality.
I am yet to see an intelligent person (from my perspective, not from various random psychometric instruments test scores) claim to be so, infact when people claim they have x or y score or tell others they are superior, they often suffer from the Dunning–Kruger effect...
The answer is 1 because it's a pattern of -2, -3, -4.
But it doesn't mean you're smart because in reality 10 birds -> 0 because they flew away together.
the good news is my emotional intellect is megapower and with the right and left brain combined i can defeat any argument and know the intrinsic secrets of the universe
Look at post #104.
When I test a person, I don´t focus on numbers alone, I try to make a proper description of the person and where they might need support. I make sure to actually description their current status and the enviroment they are in, after all.. these test are merely a snapshop of the present and not a permanent factor.
It's not a microphone