The Bible can't logically explain dinosaurs

[Slayrix]

In the Bible on day six ALL living things are created. But how can that be if the fall hasn't happened yet? When it says ALL living animals that means carnivores too, but if it's before the fall then death cannot occur, even to animals. So how could things such as carnivores, things like T-Rexes live for thousands, maybe millions of years while Adam and Eve were in the garden, without a single bit of food? That would have to mean in the beginning carnivores didn't exist and instead EVOLVED after the fall, but then that doesn't work either because evolution completely rips apart a bunch of religious ideas. We know dinosaurs exist, we know T-Rexes exist, yet the Bible cannot possibly explain it logically how they came to exist.

Also according to the Bible's logic since carnivores couldn't have possibly lived before the fall, that means the only way T-Rexes could have ever come to be is if humans co-existed with dinosaurs. But we have not been able to find any evidence that humans live even close to the time period of dinosaurs, so how does that work?

Things just don't add up here.

[Fajita Jim]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Bamford:

Not sure you are making the point you intended, this is the new crucible of evolution, they are going on a rumspringa where the reward is the Darwin award.

Them's some fancy words that mean nothing.

[Bamford]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Fajita Jim:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Bamford:

Not sure you are making the point you intended, this is the new crucible of evolution, they are going on a rumspringa where the reward is the Darwin award.

Them's some fancy words that mean nothing.

No babies no future, mother nature doesn't care about reddit obsessions with dinosaurs.

[GlaceonChireiden]

Luckily for us, we're past the age of believing random pieces of paper we found in a cave one day as a basis of existence.

I think dinosaurs are simply noncanon to the Bible.

[Fajita Jim]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Bamford:

No babies no future, mother nature doesn't care about reddit obsessions with dinosaurs.

Remember all that ♥♥♥♥ they drilled into us in school: Having a baby is like being grounded for 18 years.

Are you surprised people actually listened?

Leopards eating faces and all.

[Chunk Norris ☯]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Fajita Jim:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Bamford:

Not sure you are making the point you intended, this is the new crucible of evolution, they are going on a rumspringa where the reward is the Darwin award.

Them's some fancy words that mean nothing.

Which is why you left out the bottom of his comment which points out that religious people tend to have big families, whereas people who are against religion tend to not have any kids.

And if the newer generations aren't having kids, and the religious people are having kids...unless they indoctrinate those kids somehow, it's likely most of the religious kids, will become religious people.

[Fajita Jim]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Snow ☯:

Which is why you left out the bottom of his comment which points out that religious people tend to have big families, whereas people who are against religion tend to not have any kids.

I didn't leave out the bottom comment, you edited it into it after I posted. We can see the Edit At time, you know.

And where you do you think most atheists come from?

[Fajita Jim]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Snow ☯:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Fajita Jim:

I didn't leave out the bottom comment, you edited it into it after I posted. We can see the Edit At time, you know.

And where you do you think most atheists come from?

Atheism is a recognized and protected religion according to the US Supreme Court. You can't escape religion, it always has you.

There's actually an Atheist Church (previously it was a Satanic Church) that's down the street from a very nice BBQ place near where I live.

Did you know Jedi is a recognized religion. When i was in the military you could actually get that on your dog-tags, which some did.

(And I apologize I didn't realize he had edited the comment to add that extra bit)

Atheist literally means 'no theism'.

[Chunk Norris ☯]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Fajita Jim:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Snow ☯:

Atheism is a recognized and protected religion according to the US Supreme Court. You can't escape religion, it always has you.

There's actually an Atheist Church (previously it was a Satanic Church) that's down the street from a very nice BBQ place near where I live.

Did you know Jedi is a recognized religion. When i was in the military you could actually get that on your dog-tags, which some did.

(And I apologize I didn't realize he had edited the comment to add that extra bit)

Atheist literally means 'no theism'.

Take it up with the Supreme Court. I agree with you, but I can see their point as well. But while you might not have ANY belief, technically you're taking it on "faith" or "belief" that there's no higher power. And as such you shouldn't be discriminated against, which is why they label it as a religion and why it's Constitutionally protected.

How else would you Constitutionally protect peoples ability to not have any belief in a religion and thus not be discriminated for having those beliefs?

[Fajita Jim]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Snow ☯:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Fajita Jim:

Atheist literally means 'no theism'.

Take it up with the Supreme Court. I agree with you, but I can see their point as well. But while you might not have ANY belief, technically you're taking it on "faith" or "belief" that there's no higher power. And as such you shouldn't be discriminated against, which is why they label it as a religion and why it's Constitutionally protected.

It's labeled as a religion the same way a train isn't a motorized vehicle: it's legalese for the purposes of implementing law. It attaches no truths to the actual facts.

[Bamford]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Fajita Jim:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Snow ☯:

Which is why you left out the bottom of his comment which points out that religious people tend to have big families, whereas people who are against religion tend to not have any kids.

I didn't leave out the bottom comment, you edited it into it after I posted. We can see the Edit At time, you know.

And where you do you think most atheists come from?

Addressed it with rumspringa reference, do you read?

[Fumo Bnnuy n Frends]

that's b/c god tried to invent dinos but saw how cringe they were and smited them then restarted again lol

[Fajita Jim]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Bamford:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Fajita Jim:

I didn't leave out the bottom comment, you edited it into it after I posted. We can see the Edit At time, you know.

And where you do you think most atheists come from?

Addressed it with rumspringa reference, do you read?

Not looking good: https://www.ft.com/content/c361e372-769e-45cd-a063-f5c0a7767cf4

"Western conservatives are at risk from generations of voters who are no longer moving to the right as they age"

[SirKnechtalot]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Grynn:

Pretty sure Jesus rode around on a T-Rex smiting unbelievers.

Ge-Zuz!

[Grim Reaper]

I mean I don't think Harry Potter explains anything about our world either.

[kbiz]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Grim Reaper:

I mean I don't think Harry Potter explains anything about our world either.

Agreed.