Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://youtu.be/mp_IjREWYVE
4:12 Judging People With Justice
8:36 Justice - What's the Right Thing to do
12:43 Don't Let Others Tilt Your Scales of Justice
Then there is a consequence to an action. There is no good and evil here if you ask me.
Whomever ends up defining the line, is whomever wins the power struggle.
Good point but massive run-on sentence.
How do we fix this sh!t?
greater good being the me eating center of the toast.
You're more fortunate than you know. Billions would trade to be in your shoes.
Exactly 2.73.
Actually it depends on if I like the person or not.
Nah its not something with an exact answer. It's just a general concept. The end game is for humanity to survive, the most people need to live.
I mean it doesn't have to be life or death. We do it all the time in society. We take away the freedom of people every day in order to stop them being a bad effect on the rest of society.
If you have to commit evil for "greater good" Then this isn't "greater good"
war. the people that start a war want better times for themselves in the unknown future. war is evil to me, but how can it be avoided,? a country may be threatened and start a war in order to survive. diffult thing, but just my idea to your question.
cu.