安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
I'm sure he will appreciate that you think he is so weak that you need to help him.
Lmao that's funny. It's always exactly the same. Because boxes need to be ticked and those boxes are fixed. But hey if you're already content with them having a different hair color, you do you.
also if you don't want snark, then maybe don't be unfunny
What you just said there made absolutely no sense, by the way.
It was later adapted into the idea that many have been sleeping and unaware of the actual dangers that lay in wait, thus transitioned into its bastardized (I mean the corrupted-term use of bastardize btw mods before you get upset) form that it is now.
Its no different then how the word gay was used to mean happy, and now is an insult and many others, woke in of itself is just the demonized verison of how the reality of something is hidden to the many because they choose to ignore it and live in blissful ignorance.
"They Woke Up from Their Dream" or "They Went Woke"
I deal with history on these words, not some stupid twitter crap (or knowyourmeme/4chan)
What would they need to explain? They asked me what woke is and I was trying to explain that. They had nothing to explain.
I know that I was not attacking, I don't need any reassurance for that. But by going into defense mode, they change the subject of the conversation. Then I have to address those points they are going to bring up instead of explaining. Therefore it is a form of derailment.
So Democrats have always been the party of racism, subjugation of black people and the time we most heavily associate Democrats with racism is in the 1960's,which is when the "woke" first came to be. "Woke" was a black slang meant to convey an awareness of social issues.
Okay...so black people voting for social issues in the 1960's...what's wrong with that?
You know how most black people vote Democrat? They switched to voting mostly Democrat when America got the various social programs "The Great Society" in the 1930.
And so the majority of the black community at the time were supporting the party of the KKK, Jim Crow and Segregation because that political party also had welfare and other social programs, and yet "woke" was supposed to be these folks becoming aware of social issues?
How about they stop voting/supporting for the party that has segregation, Jim Crow and other issues that they claim to want to fight? To me these folks weren't truly oppressed but rather part of the oppressors voter base/complicit at best.
Which is perfect for the "woke" because woke people are massive hypocrites that often make the problem worse. And if this original "woke" community was supporting the party of segregation, Jim Crow and Institutional racism, then they likely were doing more harm then actual good.
Tune in next week to Chunk Norris's Learning Corner, and learn about the origins of the word Snowflake which date back to 1860's and has always been a word to mean Democrat/Left-winger.,
Because I wasn't attacking you. It simply doesn't make sense. And that comment was not directed at you, you just randomly decided to take offense to it. See, that's the whole problem here. You just want to fight. While I was just trying to explain something to you, which you yourself asked me for.
Even funnier, these so called socially aware people will now say that "woke isn't a thing".
No thanks, I'm not old enough to be a right-winger (a sentence nobody will understand because nobody know what far right is for real).
Seems to me that the typical person thinks those funny little folks who dressed up in their mothers bed-sheets going around hanging Republicans and black people and burning crosses into lawns, and supporting abortion and being anti-gun are the far-right.
They aren't.
I don't know if that was your idea of far-right or not.
Nah, the problem is what far right is for real : peoples who want to re-establish political system of the past, aka reactionnaries. Royalists are far right for example, neo-nazis are far-right too, but not for the reasons most peoples think. That's also why today's communists are also far right and so on. But as nobody use this word correctly, well ...
So yeah, I'm not old enough to be far right, I still have some time before that.
What we need is an anti-globalist left, maybe even far left.