Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
Since landscaping and gardening techniques are not religious regardless of who invents or uses them then what does creating, owning or maintaining bonsai trees have to do with Buddhist philosophy or Abrahamic religions?
Why do you ask if owning a bonsai trees is a sin?
It's a BIG sin not to use simple logic.
Otherwise the inspiration for both could just be Apollonius of Tyana. Which would be strange considering he was Greek. Then again much like Einstein there are theories regarding Socrates, Plato and the like being plagiarists.
Except where as Einstein absolutely stole someone else's patent, there's only circumstansial evidence regarding the Greeks plagiarizing the Phonecians.
So I'm pretty sure that if God is going to dislike you for appreciating the cultivation of very small trees, you either need a better God or a better conception of God.
And if it helps at all, as a Zen Buddhist I would not remotely consider you as practicing any component of it. Sometimes a tree is just a tree. Whether it falls in the forest and is heard or not, now that's the Buddhist part...
True enough...
Think of the tree!
Your keeping it stunted forever.
we also borrowed if not outright inherited much of the Phoenecian culture this is true, alphabet first and foremost. parthenogenesis doesn't really exist outside of insects and lizards.
but Apollonius being the inspiration for both? it would be strange but not because he was Greek but because Buddhism had already existed in the general India territory for at least since 6th to 4th centure BCE. he had encountered Buddhism by the time of his death.
he could influence early Christianity though, this is a possibility up to discussion.
@op: nah go for it i think you'll like it.