How long do you think until woke-ism in media is finally dead?

[Dobke]

How long until most game makers and hollywood realize that everything woke they put out end up flopping in revenue and sales? Not only that but review scores too.

I honestly thought it would've ended sooner, but we still getting more woke garbage released and I hope in 2024 it'll die down or maybe they turn it down a notch.

[Pronoun Paladin ☯]

Dom님이 먼저 게시:

Chunk Norris ☯님이 먼저 게시:

Sure there is...look at all the left-winger in colleges/Universities that are allowed to chant about genocide...actual genocide and because it's left-wing students against Jews, the school administration aren't punishing the students for it, the schools are violating their own rules in not punishing these folks.

Jew is not a race. You should come up with better examples.

If you were whoopi goldberg you'd be asked to apologize for your Holocaust denial and highly racist comment.

[Pronoun Paladin ☯]

crunchyfrog님이 먼저 게시:

Birds님이 먼저 게시:

That's an exceedingly racist thing to say.

Not at all, not even in joke.

The definition of racism is quite clear. It's to discriminate against another person based solely on their race. Doesnt' say anything about exlcuding factors or who can say it or not.

Sounds like you don't know the definition of the word discriminate...that's your Homework Crunchy...go lookup Discrimination and then share it with the class.

[Tito Shivan]

Chunk Norris ☯님이 먼저 게시:

Sounds like you don't know the definition of the word discriminate...that's your Homework Crunchy...go lookup Discrimination and then share it with the class.

You guys aren't being discriminated either. You're just feeling a glimpse of a shadow of a faint breeze of what being discriminated is really like and flipping birds on it.

[Pronoun Paladin ☯]

Tito Shivan님이 먼저 게시:

Chunk Norris ☯님이 먼저 게시:

Sounds like you don't know the definition of the word discriminate...that's your Homework Crunchy...go lookup Discrimination and then share it with the class.

You guys aren't being discriminated either. You're just feeling a glimpse of a shadow of a faint breeze of what being discriminated is really like and flipping birds on it.

One just has to look at how Black Lives Matters violent actions are treated compared to Jan 6th and see that it's clear Trump Supporters are being mistreated.

Chaz/Chop were moments when BLM activsts took over several city blocks, and held them at gunpoint and prevented all government agents from entering. They claimed their area was their own sovereign country. It was a clear Insurrection, and yet it was not treated as an insurrection.

At one time Democrats heavily persecuted black people, now they only heavily persecute black people who vote Republican.

[Tito Shivan]

Chunk Norris ☯님이 먼저 게시:

One just has to look at how Black Lives Matters violent actions are treated compared to Jan 6th and see that it's clear Trump Supporters are being mistreated.

Comparing a riot to an attempt to overthrow an elected goverment.... Whatever floats your boat buddy.

[Pronoun Paladin ☯]

Tito Shivan님이 먼저 게시:

Chunk Norris ☯님이 먼저 게시:

One just has to look at how Black Lives Matters violent actions are treated compared to Jan 6th and see that it's clear Trump Supporters are being mistreated.

Comparing a riot to an attempt to overthrow an elected goverment.... Whatever floats your boat buddy.

That's a now debunked conspiracy theory. And as far as conspiracy theories go that radical left-wing one is pretty crazy. I mean the claim is that a 3 hour mostly peaceful riot where the cops are seen being highly friendly with the so-called rioters, opening doors for them, leading them through the Capitol to give speeches in big rooms. They unlocked doors for the Q-Shaman and prayed with the Q-Shaman in one of the rooms. That's an insurrection? Lol.

There have been acquittals for Jan6thers because cops opened the door for these folks and fanned people inside.

[Tito Shivan]

Chunk Norris ☯님이 먼저 게시:

That's a now debunked conspiracy theory.

Must suck being in prison for a conspiracy theory.

[Ulfrinn]

Tito Shivan님이 먼저 게시:

Chunk Norris ☯님이 먼저 게시:

One just has to look at how Black Lives Matters violent actions are treated compared to Jan 6th and see that it's clear Trump Supporters are being mistreated.

Comparing a riot to an attempt to overthrow an elected goverment.... Whatever floats your boat buddy.

Do you not understand that using force to take control over part of a city, and actively declaring it a new country is overthrowing the elected government? Walking through a building however, is not. Absolutely nobody on January 6th made any attempt to overthrow any government.

[Scott, President of Dominos]

Ad Victoriam !님이 먼저 게시:

Triple G님이 먼저 게시:

People said that 100 years ago as well. Books were written about it. And it works even without pointing out a certain system as the root of all evil...

Normal, because all this started with the french revolution, backed by englishs to take revenge against frenchs who've supported american independance against them. Englishs invented the prototype of socialism as we know it today at that time, as an ideological weapon of destruction. Their goal was to 1 destroy the crown, done, 2 destroy the church, done, 3 destroy the peoples, work still in progress (there was two world wars in between to slow them down and destroying the church was harder than initially expected).

French revolution was the prototype of all this, we know too well what's the cost of socialism and it's way too much, ♥♥♥♥ it.

Yes, socialism is pure evil, it was created to destroy and nothing else. This time, we should not let socialism survive, it killed enough.

Gladly, we have good historians here, who find old archives about all this, even today, helping us to understand what went wrong.

None of what you posted is historical, and in fact doesn’t make any sense even with basic scrutiny.

In the early modern era, you could construe different Christian sects that settled in the Americas as a “proto-socialist society” based on agrarianism.

The modern definition of “socialism” comes from Marxist thought, which came from the Industrial Revolution and the rise of mass production. (Though there are no shortage of agrarian Marxist schools)

The English not only did not support the French Revolution, they were in several of the coalitions that fought it and funded everyone to fight the French Republic.

In fact, all of the European powers were scared that the French Revolution would spread and topple their own monarchies.

And given that they kicked out the aforementioned religious weirdos and were heavily invested in empire, there’s no ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ way they’d support socialism of any kind.

And not only did the revolution NOT weaken France, it went on to conquer most of Europe.

[Scott, President of Dominos]

Ulfrinn님이 먼저 게시:

Tito Shivan님이 먼저 게시:

Comparing a riot to an attempt to overthrow an elected goverment.... Whatever floats your boat buddy.

Do you not understand that using force to take control over part of a city, and actively declaring it a new country is overthrowing the elected government? Walking through a building however, is not. Absolutely nobody on January 6th made any attempt to overthrow any government.

Dunno if trying to grab a briefcase full of electoral votes, breaking windows and stealing ♥♥♥♥, and calling to hang the vice president counts as a “walk”

But I’ll be sure to tell the cops that once I “walk” through Wal-Mart.

[Pronoun Paladin ☯]

Makise Kurisu님이 먼저 게시:

Ulfrinn님이 먼저 게시:

Do you not understand that using force to take control over part of a city, and actively declaring it a new country is overthrowing the elected government? Walking through a building however, is not. Absolutely nobody on January 6th made any attempt to overthrow any government.

Dunno if trying to grab a briefcase full of electoral votes, breaking windows and stealing ♥♥♥♥, and calling to hang the vice president counts as a “walk”

But I’ll be sure to tell the cops that once I “walk” through Wal-Mart.

But that's not an insurrection. You could say rude behavior or in some cases criminality but an attempt to over-throw the government?

This is woke people supporting their religion and going after heretics.

[Scott, President of Dominos]

Chunk Norris ☯님이 먼저 게시:

Makise Kurisu님이 먼저 게시:

Dunno if trying to grab a briefcase full of electoral votes, breaking windows and stealing ♥♥♥♥, and calling to hang the vice president counts as a “walk”

But I’ll be sure to tell the cops that once I “walk” through Wal-Mart.

But that's not an insurrection. You could say rude behavior or in some cases criminality but an attempt to over-throw the government?

This is woke people supporting their religion and going after heretics.

You miss the “hang the vice president” part or the “grab the briefcase full of votes part”?

Or the “instigated by a fat manchild” part?

[pasa]

Chunk Norris ☯님이 먼저 게시:

Tito Shivan님이 먼저 게시:

Comparing a riot to an attempt to overthrow an elected goverment.... Whatever floats your boat buddy.

That's a now debunked conspiracy theory. And as far as conspiracy theories go that radical left-wing one is pretty crazy. I mean the claim is that a 3 hour mostly peaceful riot where the cops are seen being highly friendly with the so-called rioters, opening doors for them, leading them through the Capitol to give speeches in big rooms. They unlocked doors for the Q-Shaman and prayed with the Q-Shaman in one of the rooms. That's an insurrection? Lol.

There have been acquittals for Jan6thers because cops opened the door for these folks and fanned people inside.

Don't bother, Tito will be the last human on earth to accept the debunking. And all the other lies of the MSM that the same MSM by now all admits. As he was personally waling around here, deleting the posts stating the truth (along with the whole topic, if the convincing was not a success, what is kinda always), banning the posters. We can even answer the OP in a sipmple way: wokism is officially dead when Tito Shivan rejects it. Don't hold your breath. Inquisitors change heart so rarely that it worth an entry in the Bible when happens.

Probably a nice number of your bans is also his personal work. And little upstream the "Friendly reminder" also sounds pretty close to "guys, good ol' times I'd have put you all away for less, and maybe I still have some word with the new despots, it would be shame if something suddenly happened."

[Pronoun Paladin ☯]

Makise Kurisu님이 먼저 게시:

Chunk Norris ☯님이 먼저 게시:

But that's not an insurrection. You could say rude behavior or in some cases criminality but an attempt to over-throw the government?

This is woke people supporting their religion and going after heretics.

You miss the “hang the vice president” part or the “grab the briefcase full of votes part”?

Or the “instigated by a fat manchild” part?

Nah,I just ignored it.

The whole hang-Mike Pence is more left-wing programming...brainwashing. The gallows that was erected in was a prop...it was like 3 feet tall and made of highly flimsy wood. And it was a single guy and his friends...not the entire movement. But hey...I'm seeing left-wingers walking around with swasistka flags and chanting about genocide in support of Palestine/Hamas, are you sure you want to go down this road?


And I have no idea what your briefcase full of votes is about.

[Ulfrinn]

Makise Kurisu님이 먼저 게시:

Ulfrinn님이 먼저 게시:

Do you not understand that using force to take control over part of a city, and actively declaring it a new country is overthrowing the elected government? Walking through a building however, is not. Absolutely nobody on January 6th made any attempt to overthrow any government.

Dunno if trying to grab a briefcase full of electoral votes, breaking windows and stealing ♥♥♥♥, and calling to hang the vice president counts as a “walk”

But I’ll be sure to tell the cops that once I “walk” through Wal-Mart.

Was a briefcase of electoral votes stolen? Are those stored in a briefcase? And there's video of police breaking windows. As well as a group of people who arrived earlier, dressed entirely in black caught on film smashing windows, and then leaving before the January 6th protestors arrived. Not a whole lot of the actual protestors themselves breaking them though. Which is probably why the footage I just mentioned was intentionally withheld from public view by the people in congress who had it.