Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
What makes you think only the women were forced to marry?
You married to have children. And pool your resources together to raise them and your family better. It wasn't "I don't feel butterflies today, time to no fault".
Raising children is a realistic goal with realistic benefits to society. Love is an emotion, an ever changing one. That is very undependable. Love is one of the frailest ways to tie two people together rationally.
To base your everything on an emotion. Is a very funny thing to me. As its irrational.
Yes.
Arranged marriages are easily one of the most destructive negative aspects of any historic or current society.
Many sociological studies compare them to war or slavery. It is an extreme violation of personal freedoms. It causes deep unhappiness, rampant infanticide and child abuse, dissatisfaction, resentment, murder. It leads to mental illness at unprecedented levels. Suicide and rape rates in cultures that practice arranged marriages often exceed 90% of the population, compared with only 0.8% of populations which do not practice arranged marriages. Arranged marriages limit personal and social growth, development, diversity and also create deep social problems, such as discrimination, prejudice, extreme hatred and violence.
Children raised in cultures where arranged marriages are prevalent, are more likely to murder and or suffer extreme mental illness than not.
It is love, stability, compassion, freedom, personal growth, education, and joy, which make a strong society and a strong home to raise healthy future generations. Its not a life of forced sexual subjugation to strangers.
This very question is a selfish, narcissistic, infantile, line of thought.
You're welcome
Not everyone wants kids.
But it would be bad for those people who ended up with someone abusive.
Of course ending arranged marriages didn't end abusive marriages. There's plenty of abuse out there even today.
I bet in a lot of cases the parents would work hard to select a decent partner who they think wouldn't be abusive. But I bet there were also a lot of parents who were just out to collect the biggest dowry.
Because when you have arranged marriages, you also have dowries.
People have kids to people they love. Yes not all kids are made from 2 people who love each other. But for a marriage to work the basis of love has to be there or the marriage will fall apart. That is why i said when the love fades for what ever reason the marriage falls apart.
So arranged marriages rarely work and they might only stay together because of their families or because of their religion don't allow them to divorce. Yes granted they may fall in love over time but that is rare and just throwing 2 incompatible people together through an arranged marriage is just asking for trouble. So yes i do believe love is one of the key elements in a marriage.
Maybe we should bring it back.
They were basically hostages.
We should definitely reinstate arranged marriages.
2. In countries where it is legal for arrange marriages by the parents is it the man or the woman who is most likely to get away with cheating and maintain and finance / economically support their secrete lover?
Those 2 questions no one needs to answer because most of us know the answer.
I only asked to bring awareness to the truth about how unfair life can be to one of the genders in countries where arranged marriages are considered socially acceptable.
I beg to differ:
“But love, he said, love was a fragile blossom; love was a delicate crystal; love was an unstable reaction with a half-life of about eight months. ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥, I said, and accused him of wearing cultural blinders; thirty centuries of prewar society taught that love was one thing that could last to the grave and even beyond and if he had been born instead of hatched he would know that without being told!”
― Joe Haldeman, The Forever War
With the advent of internet news and social media, we're exposed to much larger groups and we just can't process it all.
It is a bit "ruining" to social cohesion.