Why must i pick a side???

[Valse Griffyre]

Don't agree with the leftist? I'm automatically a homophobic transphobic racist ♥♥♥♥.

Don't agree with the right wingers? I'm automatically a communist libtard who's gay and indulge in LGBT degeneracy.

Criticise Zelensky? I'm automatically an anti-west fascist who consume Russian propaganda and lick ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ Putin's ass for breakfast and support warmongering genocides in Ukraine.

Criticise Putin? I'm automatically a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ♥♥♥♥♥♥ brainwashed by western media and in love with ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ Zelensky or whatever.

Like, seriously? I always take my a neutral stance on subjects yet I'm being called out by both sides for licking the asses of other sides. Must i pick a side? Can't a cynical dude be in the middle and see both sides' stories without being called out as leaning to one side?

[Lunar Fang]

If you're not with them you're against them. Wise men have already had to deal with this and said it perfectly. If you stand by you're also apart of the problem. You're not allowed to just live your life your own way and mind your own business. You're only allowed to believe what tiktok tells you to believe.

[DoomsDay]

there is humanitarian side, but this option is not as obvious as other options.
it is alright, always remember to hold on to the leverage and keep biting down on the bone, dont be barking at the reflection of oneself.

[kbiz]

DoomsDay님이 먼저 게시:

there is humanitarian side, but this option is not as obvious as other options.
it is alright, always remember to hold on to the leverage and keep biting down on the bone, dont be barking at the reflection of oneself.

You live in China. You have one option. And that sucks. In United States we have two options.

[Adversary]

I mean so long as you're not a communist and don't harm kids or abuse animals I don't really care what your paradigm is. Because at least you're not what I'd deem a threat to civilization.

Course the whole football team mentality going on in politics is not helpful and in fact is something the founding fathers warned about. Doubly so when it comes to the uniparty establishment essentially being the same ♥♥♥♥ coming out of two ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.

Really I just want the world to be a better place but I'm surrounded by people who think that's treason. I know that feel, OP.

[Q-T_3.14.exe]

Q-T_3.14.exe님이 먼저 게시:

Gray-Mane or Battle-Born?

Got stones in your ears? I asked what side you're on, Gray-Mane or Battle-Born!

[Siluva]

Weimu님이 먼저 게시:

replying to posts is stalking now? lmao whatever helps you feel better, keep seething every time you see a rainbow flag snowflake

No bro' I won't be your friend, quit stalking and go outside meeting people for once.

[sleeps]

heck. i just think that you don't have to. you just live your life. people who force you are just a bit braindead and immature no matter their age. old people or according to braindead people, conservatives, are old and their brain's probably rotting at that point. they got no time to adapt the world surrounding them due to the said brainrotting. while the opposite side of the spectrum, young people or according to another braindead people, liberals, have their brain not fully developed yet and try to make sense of the world surrounding them. they just follow their supposed "speaker" from youtube or worse, tiktok.

or don't take my word about people who force you seriously since this is all just a stupid overgeneralization. the only advice i have is to live your life and be yourself

[Valse Griffyre]

Q-T_3.14.exe님이 먼저 게시:

Q-T_3.14.exe님이 먼저 게시:

Gray-Mane or Battle-Born? :whiterun:

Got stones in your ears? I asked what side you're on, Gray-Mane or Battle-Born! :whiterun:

I'm not picking sides.

[superslayer]

Q-T_3.14.exe님이 먼저 게시:

Q-T_3.14.exe님이 먼저 게시:

Gray-Mane or Battle-Born? :whiterun:

Got stones in your ears? I asked what side you're on, Gray-Mane or Battle-Born! :whiterun:

Gray-Manes! Death to the Thalmor!

[⚜Z3⚜ eris.exe]

You literally cannot be "neutral". You will always, inevitably, without your consent, choose a side.

[tmwfte]

Lord Gryph님이 먼저 게시:

I'm not picking sides.

Dark Brotherhood member confirmed.

[Holografix]

kbiz님이 먼저 게시:

Holografix님이 먼저 게시:

i already mentioned what's wrong with RCPolitics. And it's not my job to fix it.

Whatever.

From your comments, I see that you are a conservative. No surprise there. Check out wikipedia's page on RCPolitics.

"Rightward turn during Trump's presidency

In 2020, The New York Times noted that since 2017, when a large number of its straight news journalists were laid off, RealClearPolitics has had a rightward, pro-Trump turn with donations to its affiliated nonprofit increasing, with much of that from entities used by wealthy conservatives. Several journalists who talked to The New York Times in 2020 said they never felt any pressure from the site's founders to bias their stories.[12] The New York Times also said that "Real Clear became one of the most prominent platforms for elevating unverified and reckless stories about the president's political opponents, through a mix of its own content and articles from across conservative media" and that for days after the election, "Real Clear Politics gave top billing to stories that reinforced the false narrative that the president could still somehow eke out a win."[12] Some allies of Donald Trump falsely claimed that RealClearPolitics had rescinded its call of Pennsylvania for Biden; however, the website had not yet called a winner in the state.[25]

An October 2019 article in The Daily Beast reported that RealClear Media manages a Facebook page of "far-right memes and Islamophobic smears". Anand Ramanujan, chief technology officer for RealClear Media, responded that the company created the website that was affiliated with the Facebook page "as part of an effort to understand the flow of traffic from social media—particularly Facebook—to political websites."[26]

Real Clear Politics heavily promotes content by The Federalist, a conservative website which draws funding from the same pool of donor money as Real Clear Politics.[12]

-- from the wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RealClearPolitics

[ShadowShifterMarlith]

Mercy Maya님이 먼저 게시:

You literally cannot be "neutral". You will always, inevitably, without your consent, choose a side.

I convinced both sides to kill each other, & then took the throne for myself.
& then I chose my own side. No, no I didn't, that isn't how I played.

I should try it, though.

[ShadowShifterMarlith]

Holografix님이 먼저 게시:

kbiz님이 먼저 게시:

Whatever.

From your comments, I see that you are a conservative. No surprise there. Check out wikipedia's page on RCPolitics.

"Rightward turn during Trump's presidency

In 2020, The New York Times noted that since 2017, when a large number of its straight news journalists were laid off, RealClearPolitics has had a rightward, pro-Trump turn with donations to its affiliated nonprofit increasing, with much of that from entities used by wealthy conservatives. Several journalists who talked to The New York Times in 2020 said they never felt any pressure from the site's founders to bias their stories.[12] The New York Times also said that "Real Clear became one of the most prominent platforms for elevating unverified and reckless stories about the president's political opponents, through a mix of its own content and articles from across conservative media" and that for days after the election, "Real Clear Politics gave top billing to stories that reinforced the false narrative that the president could still somehow eke out a win."[12] Some allies of Donald Trump falsely claimed that RealClearPolitics had rescinded its call of Pennsylvania for Biden; however, the website had not yet called a winner in the state.[25]

An October 2019 article in The Daily Beast reported that RealClear Media manages a Facebook page of "far-right memes and Islamophobic smears". Anand Ramanujan, chief technology officer for RealClear Media, responded that the company created the website that was affiliated with the Facebook page "as part of an effort to understand the flow of traffic from social media—particularly Facebook—to political websites."[26]

Real Clear Politics heavily promotes content by The Federalist, a conservative website which draws funding from the same pool of donor money as Real Clear Politics.[12]

-- from the wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RealClearPolitics

The problem with Left Media, is that they blame Misinformation on people who don't even care about the Information at all... They simply see a problem, & want that problem fixed...

That is all they care about. Left Media ignores them, because Left Media calls it a threat to our Democracy when it's really not our Democracy at all, it's really a Dictatorship to make us think it is a Democracy. That is where your lies are & that is your problem.

[kbiz]

Holografix님이 먼저 게시:

From your comments, I see that you are a conservative.

Depends on the policy, Holografix. That's the problem with your labels.

Again, you label RealClearPolitics as conservative thus it must be bad thus people shouldn't look at it. Correct? Or do you think people should look at it?

And again, you don't offer a better solution. Nor do you argue against the value of a one-stop-shop to see what both parties are highlighting and neglecting.

If people want to see the bias inherent in the media, look no further than RealClearPoliticss:

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/

Go check it out today. Tell me what you don't like about today's listed articles. They come from both sides. In fact, they look to mostly be left-leaning articles today.

Anyone who wants to immediately see the rampant bias in the media only has took at two articles covering one story - one from each side. And then after while you'll already know what certain news outlets are gonna say - because you understand their bias.