Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
Progress
Here in Europe, you can still get old stock incandescent bulbs.
Anyway, there's barely any difference between high-quality LEDs and incandescent bulbs. Unfortunately, most of the stuff sold to the mainstream is low-quality rubbish now.
Not sure about the specialized bulbs, but the regular bulbs must be off the shelf and unavailable to purchase on Aug. 1.
That's effectively expropriation without compensation.
Also, speaking of easy to make, how difficult can it be to make a light bulb? We are talking about rather simple 19th century technology here. The hardest part of making a viable light bulb was figuring out which filament to use. You can kind of sort of jury rig your own with aligator clips attached to pieces of wire, a graphite pencil led, some batteries and a mason jar. It is probably not as good or convenient as a commercial bulb, but it is something if you are really desperate for some ol' fashioned incandescent lighting.
Maybe if I was more into photography then I would care more, but even then I think I would prefer to have VU1 brand E.S.L. lightbulbs[www.forbes.com]. Though then again, those do not seem to be made anymore for some reason.
Environmentalists hate that they consume so much energy for the amount of light (as measured in lumens) produced compared to other methods, and argue that any capital savings on the price of an incandescent light bulb is offset by the energy bill savings of other more efficient methods of lighting.
A ban was supposed to go into effect like a decade or so ago, when C.F.Ls. were introduced on the market just for those reasons alone, but it kept getting postponed. Oh, and also, Halogen bulbs were a little more efficient than standard incandescents, so those were able to keep up with the more lenient energy efficiency standards for a while.
Also,
"...incandescent bulbs typically have short lifetimes compared with other types of lighting; around 1,000 hours for home light bulbs versus typically 10,000 hours for compact fluorescents and 20,000–30,000 hours for lighting LEDs."
Yep, LEDs last 20-30x longer on average.
People have to throw these away more frequently in comparison to the alternatives, which, causes waste and is harmful to the environment.
This also doesn't prohibit using them, only from selling new ones.
A very good and welcomed decision.