so the whole "SJW" thing has backfired...

[kingjames488]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1gXAIVLBSY

don't expect I'll ever get an apology form any of the white knights who have been shoveling this proaganda down my throat and calling me this and that for making legitimate points...

tho at least you can't deny the massive failure of this propaganda movement since even disney is dropping it now...

here's a refreshing idea: lets not use race as a tool to get our way!

[Loot Hunter]

Messaggio originale di Snow ☯:

there are no barriers to hold groups like black or hispanic people down, in fact there's systems in place to give them an advantage.

But there are barriers and there are certain race groups that are given a clear advantage and that makes their original argument that "America isn't racist" to be untrue.

You are clearly missing the point. The reason why things like "affirmative action" exist is exactly because there are people who talk about racism and in fact make it the centerpiece of their political platform.

When people say - follow Freeman's "stop talking about racism" they don't mean that you should just shut up and never talk about race while others do. They mean that you should stop those people who push for affirmative action and other types of race agenda. They are the one who must stop talking about racism.

Systemic racism can only exist if there is a system in place to support it. That's in the name.

[Pronoun Paladin ☯]

Messaggio originale di =(^ ^)=:

Messaggio originale di Lilly:

I mean, I've heard some propose the conspiracy theory that the whole thing is meant to annoy us into a civil war. And we've never been more divided than we are now, so, maybe it's a success after all.

They say it's the right wing propaganda that pushes those contents to make the left hated.

Tbh often the right wing propaganda does show payed actors to play the stupid guy from the LGBT+ who make the stupid question, then some guy dressing a nice suite does answer to him in a formal way. This is 100% right wing propaganda.

I don't know which specific videos you're referring to, but Libs of Tik Tok sprung to mind. They don't "stage" content or edit it to make people look stupid. She allowed people to make themselves look stupid. They were just someone who took various videos from leftists and further help support/show it off, and she got a TON of crap for it.

[Pronoun Paladin ☯]

Messaggio originale di Loot Hunter:

Messaggio originale di Snow ☯:

there are no barriers to hold groups like black or hispanic people down, in fact there's systems in place to give them an advantage.

But there are barriers and there are certain race groups that are given a clear advantage and that makes their original argument that "America isn't racist" to be untrue.

You are clearly missing the point. The reason why things like "affirmative action" exist is exactly because there are people who talk about racism and in fact make it the centerpiece of their political platform.

When people say - follow Freeman's "stop talking about racism" they don't mean that you should just shut up and never talk about race while others do. They mean that you should stop those people who push for affirmative action and other types of race agenda. They are the one who must stop talking about racism.

Systemic racism can only exist if there is a system in place to support it. That's in the name.

No, I get that, and what' you're talking about is how we need to be eventually after the IMPORTANT CONVERSATION has been had. But right now we have countless people in the world who think the best way to fight racism is more racism. If we ignore their ideas instead of questioning them, they will go on having a strong movement that is doing bad, while thinking they're doing good.

I think SHAME is something that very much needs to make a greater comeback, we already see it, that's what racism/or the phobia's are, an attempt to "shame" people for wrong-think.

[Ulfrinn]

Of course it backfired. A movement (if you can call it that) that was propped up for no other reason than for a bunch of bored, suburban white kids to make themselves feel important doesn't have the integrity it needs of a legitimate movement to hold up to even basic scrutiny. Lives have been lost, homes have been destroyed, so some of the most entitled people in the western world could cosplay as white knights.

[Magma Dragoon]

If these people are losing their jobs with CRA still on the books it means firms are bleeding money and they'd rather take their chances with a civil rights lawsuit later than go bankrupt now.

[Pronoun Paladin ☯]

It's kind of funny but the SJW types typically support a giant wealth redistribution...if they turned on this racism and started attacking major corporation for pushing this garbage they could likely get the wealth redistribution they're always talking about.

[Loot Hunter]

Messaggio originale di =(^ ^)=:

You pay them or you invite stupid people, it doesn't make any difference. It's like inviting a neo-nazi to a show and telling people "this is what the right wing looks like".

Except you won't find many neo-nazis on Tik-Tok. Or other mainstream social networks. As they are banned if they start to push their ideology. People, who push left-wing ideologies, no matter how radical, usually get a pass.

There is also a question - whom do you actually invite then? Because every time some leftist (no matter who - YouTuber, politician, or even professor of some university) owned in a debate, other leftists start saying "This one doesn't represent our views".

Messaggio originale di Snow ☯:

Iif they turned on this racism and started attacking major corporation for pushing this garbage they could likely get the wealth redistribution they're always talking about.

They would get kicked in the nuts more likely. The whole point of all "virtue signallers" is that they claim to fight against the rich and powerful but in reality they are serving them for favors.

[GloriousZote]

Messaggio originale di 240p enjoyer:

the only way you will have a society where people don't pull the race card is in a racially homogeneous society

Bold of you to assume that will stop it. I'm reminded of the Fairly OddParents episode where Timmy wishes everyone looked the same and you had people going "I'm grayer than you are!"

[Ulfrinn]

Messaggio originale di GloriousZote:

Messaggio originale di 240p enjoyer:

the only way you will have a society where people don't pull the race card is in a racially homogeneous society

Bold of you to assume that will stop it. I'm reminded of the Fairly OddParents episode where Timmy wishes everyone looked the same and you had people going "I'm grayer than you are!"

For sure. We've already seen a bunch of people, especially on the left, getting trashed by what they believed was their own side for only minor differences in over all beliefs.

[Your_White_Knight]

Messaggio originale di Ulfrinn:

Messaggio originale di GloriousZote:

Bold of you to assume that will stop it. I'm reminded of the Fairly OddParents episode where Timmy wishes everyone looked the same and you had people going "I'm grayer than you are!"

For sure. We've already seen a bunch of people, especially on the left, getting trashed by what they believed was their own side for only minor differences in over all beliefs.

Agree..

When spite is their only thing they agree on.. they turn on each other for the slightest things.

[Talby]

Messaggio originale di Slim:

v That is some of the longest reaching I've seen in an argument today.

Messaggio originale di Azza ☠:

For anyone racist, homophobic or transphobic... just call them a "Cisgender" and watch them have a mental breakdown rage, jumping to assumptions about what the word "Cisgender" means.



For what purpose? Men wanting to drink a very weak beer to appear more manly suddenly felt insecure about their own sexuality, since a transgender entered a prize contest for $30,000 by advertising the product? Drinking it might turn them transgender too or something?

Are you suggesting transgenders should work for the AA (Alcoholics Anonymous) for a 100% success rate in insecure males giving up drinking?

The last bit there doesn't really make any sense or your analogy is just really bad. Wouldn't that have the opposite outcome and all the drunks would continue being drunks and not seek help?

Or better yet, since the boycott has been a success why would you need to regulate who runs AA when everyone has already stopped drinking?

Agree, having witnessed people being called "cisgender" IRL by 1d10t activists, the majority response is laughter by far

[Slim]

Messaggio originale di Talby:

Agree, having witnessed people being called "cisgender" IRL by 1d10t activists, the majority response is laughter by far

I mean seriously, who really gives a fat flying ♥♥♥♥ what other people call others. While the hypocrisy of how the ideology pushed upon people is staggering.

And I can't help but think that the entire movement would be more legit if it wasn't for all the over-the-top needy attention seekers that it has created.

[Azza ☠]

Messaggio originale di Talby:

Messaggio originale di Slim:

v That is some of the longest reaching I've seen in an argument today.



The last bit there doesn't really make any sense or your analogy is just really bad. Wouldn't that have the opposite outcome and all the drunks would continue being drunks and not seek help?

Or better yet, since the boycott has been a success why would you need to regulate who runs AA when everyone has already stopped drinking?

Agree, having witnessed people being called "cisgender" IRL by 1d10t activists, the majority response is laughter by far

Perhaps people don't understand the irony?

I'm mostly using it to mock Elon Musk claiming "Free Speech" by allowing hate speech towards the LGBTQ and transgenders on his "Y" platform or whatever it's called now. Yet he seriously got upset and raged, banning accounts for merely saying the word "Cisgender" which he assumed was worst than the n-word other white people were spewing out which he also allowed.

The word "Cisgender" actually has a meaning (The prefix cis- is Latin and means on this side of and it's even used as a sciences term), but he had thrown assumption, emotional value and censorship upon it. I personally find that illogical and stupid funny.

I enjoy mocking scammers, who are equally stupid and rage just as much, using their own hatred/greed/blindsightedness against them. I guess I get it from my scam-baiting hobby enjoyment too much? Emotionally it doesn't even affect me, rather others, but the very little effort it takes me has them going out the full mile and they hate upon what they do themselves.

[Slim]

Messaggio originale di Azza ☠:

Perhaps people don't understand the irony?

I'm mostly using it to mock Elon Musk claiming "Free Speech" by allowing hate speech towards the LGBTQ and transgenders on his "Y" platform or whatever it's called now. Yet he seriously got upset and raged, banning accounts for merely saying the word "Cisgender" which he assumed was worst than the n-word other white people were spewing out which he also allowed.

The word "Cisgender" actually has a meaning (The prefix cis- is Latin and means on this side of and it's even used as a sciences term), but he had thrown assumption and censorship upon it. I personally find that illogical and stupid funny.

I enjoy mocking scammers, who are equally stupid and rage just as much, using their own hatred/greed/blindsightedness against them. I guess I get it from my scam-baiting hobby enjoyment too much? Emotionally it doesn't even affect me, rather others, but the very little effort it takes me has them going out the full mile and they hate upon what they do themselves.

""Free Speech"" doesn't mean what people say are safe from repercussion from private entities. It merely protects what is said from governmental retribution. A better understanding of this might provide you with better context to form your opinions of that situation.

The irony in your crusade is your blatant racism in this very comment.

[Azza ☠]

Messaggio originale di Slim:

Messaggio originale di Azza ☠:

Perhaps people don't understand the irony?

I'm mostly using it to mock Elon Musk claiming "Free Speech" by allowing hate speech towards the LGBTQ and transgenders on his "Y" platform or whatever it's called now. Yet he seriously got upset and raged, banning accounts for merely saying the word "Cisgender" which he assumed was worst than the n-word other white people were spewing out which he also allowed.

The word "Cisgender" actually has a meaning (The prefix cis- is Latin and means on this side of and it's even used as a sciences term), but he had thrown assumption and censorship upon it. I personally find that illogical and stupid funny.

I enjoy mocking scammers, who are equally stupid and rage just as much, using their own hatred/greed/blindsightedness against them. I guess I get it from my scam-baiting hobby enjoyment too much? Emotionally it doesn't even affect me, rather others, but the very little effort it takes me has them going out the full mile and they hate upon what they do themselves.

""Free Speech"" doesn't mean what people say are safe from repercussion from private entities. It merely protects what is said from governmental retribution. A better understanding of this might provide you with better context to form your opinions of that situation.

The irony in your crusade is your blatant racism in this very comment.

I'm not the one making the "Free Speech" claim though? Nor am I being racist/sexist or whatever. I'm merely mocking and pointing out what you pretty much explained. It goes both ways and tends to be biasly blindsided.