Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
lol... when I get 4K it will be 20K...
What do I look like I'm made of money?... I don't need the biggest monitor or graphic card.
I run 1080 when enabled 3D SBS on a few select games with a hmd
i stick to my assesment that 4k only makes sence for screens mininum 40 inch large..
I like 120-160hz, below 1ms responce time, G-Sync and crystal clear IPS or even plasma screen.
and a 16:9 or 4:3 ratio as I need the height for my usage.
more than I see the need for 4k.
this 27 inch screen 1440p that has all that was 800 euro.. and the only one that excisted that had it all in 2016.
screens of 55 inch with all that and 4k are over 4000 euro..
my gpu could support 4k and 120 fpm but screens that have the specs I want only just start to apear.. and are very costly.
4k on any screen below 32 inch minumum : pointless cannot see the diff.
4k on a screen with only 60hz : you ruin your experience with tired eyes
4k on a screen without Sync : you ruin your experience by tearing
4k on a screen with over 1ms responce : I guess you lile loosing
4k on a screen with is TN : you must like faded and disfigured colours and to not see halve your screen due vieuwingangels
I agree with this and wrote similar in another thread.
1440p is the perfect sweetspot for 27-32"
2.69% of Steam Users = 4K