Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Better?.... how about "as good as"
anyways back to topic, no.
I have yet to play Atomic Heart tho and for what its worth I do plan to try it to see the story, I did play Bioshock infinite just for the story to and was impressed to learn how while at first we are given what looks to be a story of two timelines clashing, we actually are learning of a repeating loop that is finally closed, it took me a while but it dawned on me that had Eliz not killed the player at the end, the loop would of kept repeating, Booker gives his kid away, Eliz somehow gets something evil done to her, Booker of a much older age is the reason which leads to the first booker taking revenge in the future, repeat.
I haven't watched enough of Atomic Heart to know the real villain, so maybe ill have foot in mouth. But it feels more like a warning about the dangers of AI and humanities hubris than an on-the-nose political take.
I see similarities, having played the intro and up to "fixing the elevator" part.