Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Some questions can't be answered. For those that can be answered, gotta seek the answers from people who have actually done it. Talk is cheap. It's easy to be young and know everything.
You make assumptions, with regards to age, you insinuate (perhaps just imply in my opinion) that you have limited yourself and focus on who communicates not what is communicated.
Pertaining to questions, Just because you are unable to find answers does not mean they do not exist, I do not concede there is no answer to a question, when I ask a baker for an answer to a question pertaining to carpentry.
Well, I agree with your stance on debating Holografix.
Lots of the answers exist. The problem is people don't listen. They know better.
Whether or not people listen is irrelevant, asking the right questions to the right people is paramount.
In my humble opinion.
If making others listen was a priority one ought to take of the philosophers' hat and replace it with an ideologues' one.
His talks about the worlds fall into decay, and talks about the absurd values of religion is something I've personally came to the same conclusions of.
I similarly tore down everything to rebuild my personal world anew. I climbed out of the hole, and expanded beyond the horizons. I have went from the camel, the lion, to the child.
Maybe for people like me and you. We get ahead. They don't. And the wheels on the bus go round and round.
So what is smart philosophy?
If they aren't seeking it they are uncomfortable, or contempt with a lie or something they are already happy with.
Philosophy already has a definition, adding 'smart' before it (or 'real' which many like to do with so many words) makes no difference.
If one agrees it can be accepted, if not, rejected.
When engaging in a meaningful conversation I prefer to refrain from using subjective terms.
However, may I ask, does it have a meaning to you?
What is the right philosophy?
So sorry, you've reached a paradox as meaning is entirely subjective.
The one you adhere to.
if that is the concept you adhere to, so be it.