kingjames488 22 ENE 2023 a las 2:13 p. m.
being opposed to a female "batman" isn't sexist.
it's bat MAN... not bat woman.

just like how you can't have a male wonder WOMAN.

make a new super hero if you want it to be all ambiguous >.>
< >
Mostrando 256-261 de 261 comentarios
Fire Angel 23 ENE 2023 a las 5:20 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Shodan 2.0:
Publicado originalmente por 76561197998161904:
Batman is essentially copaganda, as is most other comic book content. Especially the Marvel Universe.

Uh, what?

Publicado originalmente por videomike_Ultimate_Plushie:
I'll say this. Making Bruce Wayne into a woman is indeed a gross and generally malicious act against the character. You cant re-write characters race and gender, the basis of -what- someone is any more than making a character historically 6 foot 4 into a pocket prince. If you must change some aspect of the character it should be done as a last resort, such as with Ghost in the Shell, where the writer admitted he simply could not find an actor to play Kusanagi of the oriental persuassion, let alone Japanese. But those aren't choices, they're necessities placed against you by reality(though the nature of "needing AAA actors" is ♥♥♥♥ IMO but w/e)

Now a female character taking up the mantle of Batman from Bruce Wayne? Already happened with Daymian Wayne and Terry Mcginis. Hell, I continue to say Jaime Rayes is the best Blue Beetle. And he didn't just suddenly become a new Batman from nowhere, it was a passing of the torch. Hell even power rangers did that when actors had to leave. Sometimes it was suddenly sometimes not, but the concept can work here. The actor signs one last movie to make the fans happy and hand off the title. You can then use the story to earn the respect of the audience and the mantle itself through heroic accomplishments or overcoming challenges which make the new hero worthy of the name like Batman Beyond or with Blue Beetle.

But, this is modern Hollywood, we know it's going to be "forget Bruce Wayne, this is the new batman who doesnt need to earn the right" or "Bruce Wayne can be a woman because no space should be restricted to woman!" In these people's books a woman should just have the right to be in a role just like any man, because not giving woman the spot for any reason is wrong. No earning it, and no respect to the original character. These people are racists and fasctists that demand their group constantly in the center as the special group.

Jim Gordon turned black in The Batman, that is stupid, but this nonsense with a "female Batman" is not even a thing and I don't understand where it's coming from.

As for Jim Gordon, I don't understand why those ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ stupid hypocrites don't just add a new cop character beside Jim Gordon for that actor to play, no one except for a negligible minority of crazies would have a problem with that.

Imagine if a black character turned white though, that would be worse than the Holocaust and then some. Speaking of which, why consciously capitalize black and only black, then proceed to whine about how it's so awful that people in 2023 pay so much attention to skin color?

Morgan Freeman said that he doesn't want to be referred as a "black man" but simply a "man" and that if you want to end racism, you should stop talking about it. That's because Morgan Freeman actually has a brain and actually isn't blatantly hypocritical.
Catwoman had the same thing happen to her.
Not Big Surprise 23 ENE 2023 a las 5:40 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Magma Dragoon:
I believe batwomen belong in the cave
must've taken a lot of effort to come up with that one
Shodan 2.0 23 ENE 2023 a las 5:55 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por 76561197998161904:
Publicado originalmente por Shodan 2.0:

Uh, what?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copaganda

That's funny because I'm currently replaying Arkham Origins (well, the whole series) and the whole police is portrayed as corrupt all the time, Alfred even says something like "Gordon is the only good apple of the bunch" when you talk to him in the Batcave. But, yeah, of course Batman (as in, the media, not just the character) would support law, justice and fighting crime instead of anarchy, that makes sense. Besides, Gotham is basically a dystopian city and that's not how the police in real life is though.

You have no reason to be against the police unless you're a criminal. Isolated incidents always can and always will happen anywhere, but they're just isolated incidents.

A few people die from vaccines too, does that mean we should never have created vaccines? How would that end up? Is vaccination automatically evil just because a couple of people out of millions and millions might die as a result of extremely rare complications? Think about that. The exact same logic applies to the police.
Última edición por Shodan 2.0; 23 ENE 2023 a las 5:58 a. m.
Rhila 23 ENE 2023 a las 6:05 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Not Big Surprise:
Publicado originalmente por Magma Dragoon:
I believe batwomen belong in the cave
must've taken a lot of effort to come up with that one
Caves are amazing places. you want to visit one to understand how charming it is.
Wheeljack 🔰 23 ENE 2023 a las 9:13 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por kingjames488:
Publicado originalmente por Kid Named Finger:

Doesn't Batwoman already exist tho?

Really makes you think....
but as I've already stated, that's not the same thing as bat man...

also no1 cares about bat woman... she isn't even wonder woman.

makes me thing "why did they create a bat woman when they already had a perfectly good batman and wonder woman"

edit: also makes me think it might have something to do with wonder woman being ridiculous and flying an "invisible jet" because I guess she can't fly? but that's wonder woman's problem.

This is the DC multiverse..... where literally anything can happen in any one of those universes. so it ain't that out there to suggest that a Batwoman might exist in one of those universes.

Also I'm sure there's at least a couple dozen people that cared about Batwoman.
Fire Angel 23 ENE 2023 a las 9:46 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Kid Named Finger:
Publicado originalmente por kingjames488:
but as I've already stated, that's not the same thing as bat man...

also no1 cares about bat woman... she isn't even wonder woman.

makes me thing "why did they create a bat woman when they already had a perfectly good batman and wonder woman"

edit: also makes me think it might have something to do with wonder woman being ridiculous and flying an "invisible jet" because I guess she can't fly? but that's wonder woman's problem.

This is the DC multiverse..... where literally anything can happen in any one of those universes. so it ain't that out there to suggest that a Batwoman might exist in one of those universes.

Also I'm sure there's at least a couple dozen people that cared about Batwoman.
Last known is that she had 15,000 fans in 2018 when her comic ended.
< >
Mostrando 256-261 de 261 comentarios
Por página: 1530 50

Publicado el: 22 ENE 2023 a las 2:13 p. m.
Mensajes: 261