Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
:)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8qJauiEVWY&t=81s&ab_channel=DodgyGeezah
Me too. Angel has integrity, intelligence, and energy.
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."
"That's median, you idiot!"
I never got people's worship of Carlin. He wasn't even the best Mr. Conductor.
After all, since mass isn't really a physical thing but merely a way to describe dimensional spacetime curvature (and the illusion of time-dilation) around radiation of energy and the massless speed of light, in form of causality-introducing gravity (logos)...
It kind of makes more sense for you to extrapolate and have a position in space, time, and galaxies, right? With there not being an aether-like "fluid," but there being a thing akin to mass and energy that dimensionally describes why different objects (galaxies) appear in a relatively expanded universal context, the same way mass correlates curvature. With every cluster of galaxies logically believing itself as "the most central" from their own dimensional reference frame (non-locally tied to black holes)... describing why objects even appear outside of black holes at all, in line with dark energy, respective to the speed of the expansion of the (at least 5-dimensional) universe, maybe fusion type of processes, etc.
It's not necessarily intelligent on my part. But it has kind of been on my mind recently. Also since it's interesting when people repeat the same mistakes - falling for illusions - which is a bit like a cat that would integrate distant objects becoming smaller into its theories, because it can't question these illusions.
And it's certainly interesting if you think about what could theoretically be possible given the categorical extrapolation of dimensional illusions and higher realities. Are you falling for a dimensional illusion when believing that people actually die? Or that they even are "in" their "body?" Especially since you can't ever observe the actual thing in itself (noumenon), but can question the superficial nature of measurements?
Are we all ignorant cats?
(I also had another shorter thought I found funny and would rather post, but it's not really in line with the board rules. So I simply rehashed this again.)
More to the point, it would be to not be in this forum.
This has nothing to do with "intelligence"... it's kind of the opposite.
This is all about the feelz.
Calgon, take me away!
I want off this ship of fools.