Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
https://youtu.be/6yBGWZlCQcM
1. It would be impossible to cook a burger, unless it is past the karman line.
2. Not sure
3. ??
4. HAARP radiates energy, "tractor beams" are fictional.
5. Can you reword the question?
And I find it strange that literally it alone is classed as an ASAT...an Anti-Satellite orbital platform which there are 6 in the Kosmos family.
Yes, I guess it would be rather strange for the US to take out a satellite unless it of course was a weapons satellite...
Also your doctor you brought up?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Chossudovsky
I need not say more....but your believing a man whos claims also say that Putin is responsible for both 9/11 and the 2005 London Bombings, has disinformation heavily about vaxinations AND OUTRIGHT DENIES COVID EXISTS.
At this point I'm not going to bother when the research as I said in a prior post.
More fake stories made by people who claim their doctors yet are clearly neither professors in the field they are making claims of (Choss is a freaking economist and author, not a doctor in any form) and end up making people, such as yourself, panic over nothing that exists.
Hell its funny he admited apparently he's a pro-russian propagandist to apparently, thats interesting.
But i like reading it.
He doesn't, he heard the crap from some obscure conspiracy theory ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and now, like an enlightened, free-thinking, non-brainwashed non-sheep that he is, he blindly believes in it and spreads it around like the plague. Talk about propaganda, eh?
But the number one thing I wont deal with are people who both struggle to comprehensively read a paragraph without confusing them so badly they just burn the book, and those that have their illogical fictional doomsday worlds plotlines outside of Fallout.
I'm out of here before my head literally leaks anymore brain cells.
Note: I dont even have Shodan blocked on his first nor original account, and me and him have some disagreements, just so peeps understand how annoying a situation or person needs to reach before I give up on reasoning with them.
Forget about this HAARP thing itself and everything about it and instead, let's take a look at this case at the core.
Why the hell would any ordinary person hear and "know" all this crap about this HAARP and how come so many are so united against this specific random thing?
Is it because HAARP gets in your way in your everyday life so much that you can't not be aware of it? You just naturally "learn" everything about it because that's a normal part of life?
I know why, it's because certain sources (of conspiracy theories and nothing else) targeted this specific thing as a part of some ridiculous theory, then all the people who totally aren't blind and brainwashed sheep instantly believed in that theory simply because it brought up some "fancy scientific terms" which no one even understood.
And if you don't understand one of those "fancy terms", it has to be because the person who used them is a genius, we trust them as soon as they pull "fancy terms", everyone who uses those is automatically right. So, as a result, now we have so many people are so upset over this same random thing.
I find it amazing how today, some completely illiterate toothless rednecks in the middle of nowhere, who don't know anything about anything, are suddenly "experts" when it comes to HAARP and all the other fancy science stuff. Literally all fields, they "know" everything about all of them. I love how that works, totally makes sense. Even medicine, for example, is way, way too broad for just one single person to know all about all branches, but these guys know about all branches of medicine and all branches of everything else there is.
Absolutely, they are present in the OP and also throughout my defensive arguments.
If you're skeptical about anything, just ask.
4.
In order to pull an object towards the source of the energy, the force of the beam would have to be greater than the force of the object's inertia. However, the fundamental laws of physics dictate that it is not possible to exert a force greater than the force of an object's inertia. This means that it would be impossible to create a beam of energy that could overcome the force of an object's inertia and pull it towards the source of the beam.
In order for a "tractor beam" to work, the beam of energy would have to be able to transfer energy from the source to the object being pulled. However, the fundamental laws of physics dictate that energy cannot be transferred from one object to another without the transfer of momentum. This means that it would be impossible for a beam of energy to transfer energy from the source to the object being pulled without also transferring momentum.
5.
By having multiple IRI installations, scientists would be able to heat larger areas of the ionosphere, allowing for more comprehensive studies of ionospheric phenomena. Additionally, having multiple IRI installations would allow for more accurate measurements of ionospheric conditions, as scientists would be able to compare data from different locations.
However, it's important to note that, with more IRIs, the overall power of HAARP does not increase linearly, as it depends on the characteristics of the ionosphere and the location of the IRIs. Also, the cost of building and maintaining multiple IRI installations would be significant, and there could be potential negative environmental effects, such as disruption of communication systems or impact on wildlife.
One of the most compelling pieces of evidence is the research conducted by Dr. Bernard Eastlund, a physicist who holds several patents related to HAARP technology. In his patents, Eastlund describes a system that is capable of "causing changes in the Earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere." This includes the ability to "create airglow, auroras, change the dynamics of the upper atmosphere and change weather patterns", one of the main fields of study of the HAARP.
https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Bernard+J.+Eastlund
Furthermore, a study conducted by the European Union in 1998 concluded that HAARP "could lead to the triggering of earthquakes, tsunamis, and an upset in the climate balance." The report also states that "the environmental impact and the ethical implications of HAARP must be examined more closely."
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/press/sdp/backg/en/1998/b980209.htm
It's also important to note that, despite being officially closed in 2014, the IRI (Ionospheric Research Instrument) used by HAARP is still active and "maintained" by the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Furthermore, a recent study from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has shown that the ionosphere can be influenced by high-frequency radio waves, which is the main technology used by HAARP.
https://sam.gov/opp/e2f7dab56e354035a485ca4b7ebea0ae/view
https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2022-04-22
It is a complete cover same way Area 51 is.
Thinking they keep aliens in Area 51, keeps people looking at thousands other places they could be.
Thinking HAARP is used to control weather keeps people from noticing the entire grid of more modern Atmospheric Ionizer type facilities which are used for more than just tamper with weather. Used heavily for surveillance and spreading chemicals. Probably used to "combat climate change" if anyone asks along with other questionable things like... blocking out the sun - to combat climate change. Nowdays it would also combat hearth inflammation, because climate change is responsible for heart disease too in case you haven't heard yet. Athletes have always been highly prone to it, they just been lucky it was super rare in the last century when we didn't have to deal with climate change.