Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
that means Jordan is better than you.
--
- and he's correct. it's hard to justify who is or isn't your friend these days, and their intentions could be vastly different than their public opinion.
Also without hearing the exact quote, which I think I have before, doesn’t seem that dumb. People say dumb or average things all the time, you’re simply cherry picking this to fit your example. I mean what, we’re not supposed to consider who we want to be friends with before we before they’re friends?
Is this another one of those extremely wise and deep Instagram quotes that enlightened teenagers who discovered the purpose of life like to throw around and I'm just a mortal who doesn't listen to Jordan Peterson enough to understand it?
Credits for that video in the original post.
I don't "wanna go in", I'm perfectly fine with being friends like I've been friends with anyone else. Relationships require much more commitment than friendship and it would have to be someone I could live with in the same house every day for the rest of my life. That can't be anyone, but that doesn't mean those people can't be my friends. I don't label people with Greek letters and that thing about friendship was one of those "shorts" which was that quote alone and nothing else, it's not like I took something out of context from a long interview.
You absolutely don't understand what people like Peterson are trying to teach and tell you yes - he's not telling you to follow him or his teaching or his wisdom, he's not telling you follow -his- rules, his philosophy is - live for yourself, do what you need to do, to stay happy. treat people with respect, and give them freedom, and don't take other peoples freedoms.
It's pretty telling that you view the man in such a light when -those- are his values.
To many people now-a-days don't realize that because they think that having 20+ "friends" means they actually have 20+ "friends". They don't. Out of those 20+ people, how many will actually have their back?
You will find out how fast those friends will vanish when your life takes a bad turn.
He should live by those words himself then.
He got kicked from that school because he, as a teacher who is supposed to teach and raise children, went out of his way to argue with a student because he just had to disrespect the student directly, he couldn't resist keeping his private opinion and political bias to himself which is extremely unprofessional and unacceptable, especially in a school where you're supposed to be taught something by a teacher instead of just listening to whatever personal opinions they're trying to force.
He can think whatever he wants, that's not a problem, this isn't a case of "thought police" like the delusional conspiracy theorists like to say, the problem is that he just couldn't resist and just keep it to himself in the wrong time and place. He's a grown up man and he just cannot resist arguing with children at the campus. That's rock bottom. Absolutely pathetic. And then he pulls those bizarre "freedom of speech", "neo-marxist" and other conspiracy theory tropes. Going around and being disrespectful directly toward someone is just a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ thing to do, but you're telling me that he's all about treating people with respect.
To be a bit pedantic, that applies just as much to both sexes. I don't tell you what you've experienced, but I find it's an either both sex or neither kind of situation. But what can you do, the human brain is wired for a k-selected mating process. That ain't gonna change anytime soon. Still, it's not at all difficult to tell anyone "no thank you," and be received. That being said I'd think the outbreak of political extremeism is a bigger issue. Hard to be honest when you're worried the second you share your politics you risk losing your new potential friends...
You can't dictate what another human being says while giving them freedom and respect, he didn't start the argument, he just put his foot down and said he isn't going to play the game at all.
Or did you not look into the literal legal actions against him? And when is the "right time and place," quietly to himself or among silent peer groups? Is a man not allowed to stand by his beliefs? Hell, you could say the same as the student. why should the student get to speak when the teacher has to shut his mouth and be told what to say? Whats the point of even having a teahcer if you can order him to stop talking mid-lecture. It seems to me the only one not giving respect is you, who just takes the worst possible take to ♥♥♥♥ on someone and denies everything else around it.
Pretty much; as I understand it was a debate about legally compelled speech.
Yeah, obviously. Do you really need someone with a degree in psychology to tell you that and is that really such a wise thought or is it common sense that children in kindergarten have?