安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Well, not that it had any competition to begin with.
Not sure if I can call it the "coolest" of all time. Sounds like an opinion to me.
Influence wise, Atari, SNES, the Game Boy, and of course, the predecessor PS1, probably have more than the PS2.
its mostly about what you owned and loved "back in the good old days" ps2 wouldn't make my top 10 list but its the most sold console of all time -159 million.
Chad Dreamcast: MVC2 runs flawlessly.
PS2 "ports" couldn't do Quake 3 or Unreal very well. :D
Shame too, because the PS3 was actually superb hardware. Literally a better gaming machine than the 360 with better performance all the way down to the actually physically material used. The 360 felt very fragile. Not that the PS3 wasn't fragile, but it just felt like it was made sturdier to me.
As you said, god awful marketing decisions, and a heap of missed opportunities. The 360 got ALL the best games in that era, and at the end of the day, that is all that matters for a gamer.
Dreamcast library was terrible. It's best games were ports of PS1/N64 stuff with a little polish on it and it by far had the worst controller of anything Nintendo, Sony, Sega, or Microsoft has ever put out.