Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And he did.
An assumption of guilt like that without any evidence to support it seems to indicate you have a bias in favor of NVIDIA.
I currently have a 6900XT and I have no plans to buy Nvidia or Intel when I will upgrade.
Nvidia has been doing that for years. They also create gimmicks like PhysX, which is just particle effects any CPU could run, then paid developers to disable those features unless gamers were using a Nvidia GPU... despite that stuff being able to be processed on a CPU with little effort.
It does come close to an rtx4080 but not better than (15%) it but still is almost 200 euro cheaper
that would be the rx6800xt
and what about AMD gpu and their ability to do ray tracing? are there specific cards for that?
I like benchmarking, but I'm a nerd xd
the newest 7900xtx should have raytracing.
The AMD 6800 XT is the competitor of RTX 3080.