安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
you just nuts xd
And war-time president has to be one with its people and one way to do that is by refraining from using uniforms and expensive clothing.
There is an atrocious brutal war on democracy and international rules-based order, and if you're focused on clothes in the midst of all this - then you should perhaps re-consider your priorities and focuses.
I recommend he tries being one with the people by letting the Ukrainian military shell him with artillery as Ukraine has been done to its citizens for years.
Why does NATO need to fire a shot themselves when they can get others to do it for them? You do know what a proxy war is right?
Stolen? There was a referendum, the citizens there voted on it. They voted to leave after the person the majority of people in those provinces voted for was overthrown by a coup lead by a group that publicly vowed several times to wipe out all ethnic Russians, which millions in the Donbas region happen to be.
Referendums with Russia involved are just like their elections - 99.9%.
Not what happens in the Ukraine though.
It was Putin who attacked, and western nations are merely providing some much needed support.
Also, the Ukraine is kind of locked in place; so the only way to stop this war is by Putin moving out. Or Putin getting what he wants, but let's hope that doesn't happen.
Putin didn't attack until 2022. The civil war has been going on since 2014. A civil war which has seen several bombs and shells fall on cities in eastern Ukraine over the past 10 years. This war wouldn't have even been started in the first place if NATO stuck to their agreements of not pushing NATO influences into countries on the Russian border, or backed a coup overthrowing the elected leadership in 2014.
Pretending this was some random, spontaneous aggression by Russia and NATO is just innocently sitting by with clean hands helps nobody. NATO created the mess, Ukrainian oligarchs are profiting off it, while innocent people are dying for a power play by people thousands of miles away supported by citizens in those countries who refuse to call out their own sides.
He's not gonna wear fancy expensive suits, while people in the country he's president of are suffering.
>"This is all bout NATO and it's NATO's FAULT!"
For Russia, it kind of is -- they seem to have no idea about fighting a "modern" war, being stuck with antiquated doctrine that's pretty much WW-2 or cold-war era at best. And their entire recruitment seems to be focused on getting cannon fodder...
In the meantime, the Ukrainian army has been trained to NATO standards since Crimea; while this was not "completed", they've turned into a much different beast compared to what Russia encountered in 2014...
... so yeah, it's kind of NATO's fault the Russians couldn't just waltz in and grab the rest of the Ukraine as well. They actually launched a rather daring attack when starting the war, which would have worked if Ukraine was still in 2014, and might even have worked if Russia had done it properly -- but NATO training, some luck, and Russian negligence allowed Ukraine to deny them a day-1 victory, and everything went downhill for the Russians ever since.
Maybe I'm cautiously optimistic.