Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Which of these posted here have you refuted do tell and how you have refuted them? By saying he is the president and there is no one else, or by making the case of normalizing corruption and some how making it acceptable than proceeding with how is totally normal that this guy is corrupted.Your arguments are not only weak, but the pinnacle of bs and logical fallacies.
Corruption is the norm and his corruption, which other more talented people than me have refuted, through exploiting information they gained via their own corruption, have exonerated Mr. Zelenskyy from these accusations.
Perhaps you should come up with some good talking points which refute the ubiquitous nature of corruption, rather than dragging my good words through the mud you seem to live in.
What are you reffering to, care to provide us with referencess and proof?
No thanks, I don’t want to dig through hundreds of pages of fake news articles claiming ten thousand different things just to find the one I agreed with.
Than keep up with logical fallacies because you have no actual proof to make an counter argument nor anything substantial to add.
If your only proof is a bunch of made up articles then we’re at a stalemate either way.
Because you say so without proofing how exactly are they made up. Empty rhetoric seem to be your biggest point in arguments.
No sir, you must prove they are real. Otherwise it is my right to take the default position and simply disbelieve it.
The burden of proof is on the claimant, always.
Explaine here who are the organizations and how they conduct research on Corruption Perceptions Index:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_International
Explained here what are the panama papers leaks and what leaktivism is:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Papers
Wikipedia articles? Wrote these yourself, I bet.
I press X. Experience my doubts.
Haha o wow nice come back.
Thx. You too.
Next time you try to refute something do it by proof not by hasty generalization, and red herrings.
https://youtube.com/shorts/p-A4zNHrEWY?feature=share
- Above, Zelensky in suit and tie. The pain in his face says it all. xD
No cap fam, We're legit so glad Trump was thrown out of office.
Biden is much better for US-Europe relations.
As Europeans we are now so much more optimistic for the whole free world and democracies being united together.
We need to support each other from dictatorships and not lick Putin's behind like Trump did.
#agedlikemilk