Bethesda got rid of male and female options in Starfield, an RPG.

[Shodan 2.0]

Yeah, all their previous games let you pick either a male or a female character which would allow unique bonuses in Fallout, now you must be some kind of a "gender neutral" meat bag labeled something like "Body Type 1" because people want to make this nonsense the new norm for everyone it seems.

And it's not just Starfield:

Elden Ring (all those Souls games are overrated and their difficulty especially, by the way) also has the body type A and B kind of stuff and they also used to have male and female options.

Forza Horizon 5 (these games also used to have male and female options until now) has a bunch of clearly male and female characters awkwardly mixed together under a single tab because that just makes so much sense, then when you finally find the one you want, you get a new tab for choosing some kind of "identity" even though you already picked either a male or a female character which must have taken longer than it should considering how they're all mixed together like that.

Clearly a nonsensical political trend since all these games are changing to the exact same stupid system all of a sudden, but all of them used to have the same options until recently. Welcome to 2022 where it's offensive to label things male and female because that apparently doesn't exist anymore since that's totally a thing that can just change with time.

I'm off to bed now and by the time I return here tomorrow, this thread will probably be locked.

[❤ Sly Succubus ❤]

引用自 sotaponi：

引用自 Frey：

Male and Female is an immutable biological fact. A haircut is different.

"Biology" is an overall poorly defined field. Especially if you want to read things into ideas such as genes or maybe even genders or sexes.

For example, is there really a process such as "natural selection," or is it merely your poor interpretation? After all, "natural selection" might merely coincide the process of a new type of macro object forming right now, the same way the eye once formed. Doesn't mean that human eyes, as particular expression of their universal form, came to be as a result of "natural selection of genes." The same way you wouldn't say that the form of a universal GPU in a computer is the result of "natural selection of transistors."

("Biology" postures about this as hard fact, when it's little more than an unproven unscientific dogma that was long preceded by the theory of karma-based rebirth. And surely the idea of a GPU exists a priori - or coincides - transistors. And phenomenal particles cannot describe the gravitational/entropic evolution of macro objects, as even quantum physics and dark matter type of phenomena suggest.)

The visual cortex and qualia such as sight certainly didn't form because of "natural selection." Nor do molecules form because of "natural selection," as there isn't a set of stable molecules because of "natural selection." Instead, there are form-tied laws leading to stable entropy/dark energy and coinciding "gravity" in the systematic context of dimensions. Moreover, ultimately, are there black holes and galaxies. But black holes and dark matter type of possible illusions, too, don't exist because of "natural selection."

...

Anyway, if people follow a "deconstructionist" type of narrative in regards to sexes, and also want to feel "shameless" and such on the same note... They declare themselves "animals," forgoing the development of consciousness and language that transpires around the ages 3-5. And then surely there's no way that one can have a single global world, because not everyone would want to live with such radically anti-intellectual and regressive types.

But if this is on the same note, then they are not building on sexes to maybe express something greater (like e.g. society), the same way there are eyes and corresponding qualia in the context of genes.

And the sentiment of doing such might ultimately be about as absurd as "deconstructing" the (e.g. Platonic) form of the visual cortex or eye. And how exactly do they want to deconstruct the form of the eye and related dark energy-like qualias such as sight? Why would you even want it? Instead of maybe developing it to something better and more well refined.

So the question you would ask is why, and in what context, do sexes exist? Granted how there is the "mushroom have thousands of sexes" argument... but mushrooms don't really copulate. Instead, they seem to multiply from mere hug-induced spore releases. And since mushrooms don't have eyes... they don't have a brain. They are primitives. Maybe like neurons or stem cells. So to compare the "sex" of a mushroom to the "sex" of a human might be akin to comparing a singular neuron or stem cell to a complete sense organ, that can appear in either human sex.

Point being: You can say that, in an astrological sense, sexes exist. And in this astrological sense, they exist in a macro societal context. But you can't use sexes as "hard" idea to describe themselves without societal context at large. For the same reason that there are quantum type of phenomena, dark matter, etc.

Doesn't mean that they aren't a building block, of course. And that doing all sorts of nonsense with this building block is somehow a good idea.

I'mma stop you here mate...

"The visual cortex and qualia such as sight certainly didn't form because of "natural selection." Nor do molecules form because of "natural selection," as there isn't a set of stable molecules because of "natural selection." Instead, there are form-tied laws leading to stable entropy/dark energy and coinciding "gravity" in the systematic context of dimensions. Moreover, ultimately, are there black holes and galaxies. But black holes and dark matter type of possible illusions, too, don't exist because of "natural selection.""

This is not Biology field based, that is Physics field based.

Only Physics has the rule of not using mathematical answers to the summed riddle, the two fields are not crosslining so using this example is illogical out of the gate, black holes and dark matter are products of the physics field down to their very energy fields, biology is handled completely differently, seriously I also saw "Singular neuron"

Lets just say that seriously, dont mix up the three major research fields, they dont cross for a reason because they never do.

Comparing gravity which sum of energy to mass projected literally has no connections to how air is turned carbon during breathing.

[Fake]

引用自 Shodan 2.0：

引用自 doug：

Nobody is pretending that there's no such thing as male or female. You're arguing against your own imagination.

Then what's up with all this crap and all these theories about how there is no such thing as gender and so on?

There is someone on the Supreme Court of the United States of America that doesn't know what is a woman.

[ุ]

It's a shame our reproductive organs aren't a little more simple, cuz then we'd see cases of bilateral gynandromorphism in humans. Which would be WILD to see peeps like OP lose their minds over.

[Fake]

引用自 Leonardo Da Pinchi：

引用自 Shodan 2.0：

Then what's up with all this crap and all these theories about how there is no such thing as gender and so on?

Gender and sex are two different things, gender is a social construct, sex is biology.

Go watch Kindergarten Cop. It'll clear up your confusion.

[❤ Sly Succubus ❤]

引用自 Fake：

引用自 Shodan 2.0：

Then what's up with all this crap and all these theories about how there is no such thing as gender and so on?

There is someone on the Supreme Court of the United States of America that doesn't know what is a woman.

There's a lot of people in the Supreme court that are of questionable intelligence Fake, thats ignore the worrying ones..

[doug]

引用自 Shodan 2.0：

引用自 doug：

Nobody is pretending that there's no such thing as male or female. You're arguing against your own imagination.

Then what's up with all this crap and all these theories about how there is no such thing as gender and so on?

Gender and sex aren't the same thing.

[ุ]

引用自 Fake：

引用自 Leonardo Da Pinchi：

Gender and sex are two different things, gender is a social construct, sex is biology.

Go watch Kindergarten Cop. It'll clear up your confusion.

Cope, seethe, mald.

[Q-T_3.14.exe]

引用自 Munithe EXT：

引用自 Q-T_3.14.exe：

Coming out of the closet. What are you afraid of?

That the government is gonna force us all to become gay by law.

Then join me in the closet. The potato chips are in the left corner at the eastern wall and pop on the opposite of them. Hard wooden floor might be well hard but it does the trick, you may want use jackets as a blanket and shoes as pillows.

[❤ Sly Succubus ❤]

引用自 Leonardo Da Pinchi：

It's a shame our reproductive organs aren't a little more simple, cuz then we'd see cases of bilateral gynandromorphism in humans. Which would be WILD to see peeps like OP lose their minds over.

Well perfecting hybridinzation would be a first step, I'd be lying if humans have not tried, Unit 731 (Dont look it up unless you want to bleach your eyes) was literally a very inhuman, but still the first steps into that field, still a long ways off but if mastery of the cell and genetic restructuring happens then the future is one of interest

[Shodan 2.0]

引用自 Fake：

引用自 Shodan 2.0：

Then what's up with all this crap and all these theories about how there is no such thing as gender and so on?

There is someone on the Supreme Court of the United States of America that doesn't know what is a woman.

In Croatia, and we've always been far behind the rest of the world, there was some kind of a program from the mayor of the capital city which used the term "people who menstruate". I don't see how calling a woman a "person who menstruates" is any less bad than the classic "sandwich-maker" kind of ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. Apparently, men can menstruate now, I've actually seen people saying that. MENstruation, I guess. Holy ♥♥♥♥.

[Volfogg]

So if it is about gender as a concept, why are they removing sexes from character creation? Wouldn't it be easier to add gender slider of some sort?

[Shodan 2.0]

引用自 doug：

引用自 Shodan 2.0：

Then what's up with all this crap and all these theories about how there is no such thing as gender and so on?

Gender and sex aren't the same thing.

引用自 Leonardo Da Pinchi：

引用自 Shodan 2.0：

Then what's up with all this crap and all these theories about how there is no such thing as gender and so on?

Gender and sex are two different things, gender is a social construct, sex is biology.

No. And I just can't get over how people who keep going on about how it's all just made-up crap by "the society" make that exact "made-up" thing their entire personality and keep trying to fit into it badly. They claim to be against "stereotypes" and stereotypes, but when they want to prove something and when it goes in their favor, then they resort to them more than the most conservative 80 years olds who go to church every day. I'm male and I've had long hair since I was born, so what? But those people feel endangered by that because it's one of their main argument against "misgendering" them, even though they claim to be against such ridiculous stereotypes like how only women can and must have long hair, have everything in pink color and so on. Like, just make up your ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ mind already, are you against stereotypes or not? Is gender all just a made-up concept or not? Nothing but contradictions from those people.

As for me, I don't feel male in the slightest.
I simply am male. Just how it is, whatever, I just do whatever I naturally feel like doing and I'd be doing the same if I were female instead. The end.

[ุ]

Nobody tell OP that the human fetus STARTS female, he might not be able to come to terms with it.

[doug]

引用自 Shodan 2.0：

引用自 doug：

Gender and sex aren't the same thing.

引用自 Leonardo Da Pinchi：

Gender and sex are two different things, gender is a social construct, sex is biology.

No. And I just can't get over how people who keep going on about how it's all just made-up crap by "the society" make that exact "made-up" thing their entire personality and keep trying to fit into it badly. They claim to be against "stereotypes" and stereotypes, but when they want to prove something and when it goes in their favor, then they resort to them more than the most conservative 80 years olds who go to church every day. I'm male and I've had long hair since I was born, so what? But those people feel endangered by that because it's one of their main argument against "misgendering" them, even though they claim to be against such ridiculous stereotypes like how only women can and must have long hair, have everything pink-colored and so on.

Calm down buddy, what are you talking about? I think you're debating against your own imagination again.

[Shodan 2.0]

引用自 Leonardo Da Pinchi：

Nobody tell OP that the human fetus STARTS female, he might not be able to come to terms with it.

I heard of that, yeah. Why would that be a problem?