Elon musk bans account shared the video of him booed

[bvrakvs]

what a clown

[Boblin the Goblin]

Azza ☠님이 먼저 게시:

KittenGrindr님이 먼저 게시:

It wasn't illegal at the time. Apple just claimed it was so. The court just told them 'No."

The law was rewriting to allow jailbreaking later on afterwards, it's a new exemptions from a 1998 federal law. Jailbreaking phones became legal in 2010, after George Hotz did it back in 2008.

Hense George Hotz release upon the date: 10/11/10

The law wasn't rewritten. The Copyright Office concluded "while a copyright owner might try to restrict the programs that can be run on a particular operating system, copyright law is not the vehicle for imposition of such restrictions."

It was never on the books as illegal, only Apple told it's users that it was because of how the law was written. After the case, an exception was added to clarify it didn't apply to cellphones since the law was created before the rise of mobile operating systems and the iPhone.

[Azza ☠]

KittenGrindr님이 먼저 게시:

Azza ☠님이 먼저 게시:

The law was rewriting to allow jailbreaking later on afterwards, it's a new exemptions from a 1998 federal law. Jailbreaking phones became legal in 2010, after George Hotz did it back in 2008.

Hense George Hotz release upon the date: 10/11/10

The law wasn't rewritten. The Copyright Office concluded "while a copyright owner might try to restrict the programs that can be run on a particular operating system, copyright law is not the vehicle for imposition of such restrictions."

It was never on the books as illegal, only Apple told it's users that it was because of how the law was written. After the case, an exception was added to clarify it didn't apply to cellphones since the law was created before the rise of mobile operating systems and the iPhone.

I like you. We tend to agree to disagree, yet correct each other. Respect.

[The nameless Gamer]

Snow ☯님이 먼저 게시:

The nameless Commander님이 먼저 게시:

That's hogwash. I live in an autocratic state and nobody has been jailed over speech.

Even hate speech? Even offensive speech? What country?

It's Serbia. The Balkan peninsula is generally a VOLATILE place and with old wounds being kept open by our politicians it's impossible to define hate SPEECH. Actions however WILL get you in trouble. The Balkans is a place where we have bigger fish to fry than whether someone made a racist or "trans-phobic" joke. KittenGrindr is right though, stepping on the toes of the ruling political parties is ill-advised but won't get you outright jailed, unless you really keep proverbially stomping on their toes.

[Boblin the Goblin]

The nameless Commander님이 먼저 게시:

Snow ☯님이 먼저 게시:

Even hate speech? Even offensive speech? What country?

It's Serbia. The Balkan peninsula is generally a VOLATILE place and with old wounds being kept open by our politicians it's impossible to define hate SPEECH. Actions however WILL get you in trouble. The Balkans is a place where we have bigger fish to fry than whether someone made a racist or "trans-phobic" joke. KittenGrindr is right though, stepping on the toes of the ruling political parties is ill-advised but won't get you outright jailed, unless you really keep proverbially stomping on their toes.

Oh ♥♥♥♥.

I watched a mini-history on the 2Balkan4You subreddit.

That forum sounded ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ amazing lol.

[Plaid]

Azza ☠님이 먼저 게시:

Plaid님이 먼저 게시:

No one man can run a site like that. Do as the previous guy did and get the FBI to run it for you

Twitter had 7500 staff, which was logically part of what Elon Musk had purchased (skilled and knowledgeable, already trained and know Twitters coding/functioning requirements).

Elon Musk had dropped that figure to less than 2900 Twitter staff. He had actually fired every single programmer and had the trust/safety staff down to 12 with full access still allowed.

He then hired the ex-hacker George Hotz, who had previously (illegally at the time) jail broke the apple iphone to work free for 12 weeks as a cheap intern. Demanding that he fixes everything. Still clueless in providing another reason for Apple to drop Twitter, yet goes out of his way to scapegoat blame other reasons.

Changed the Twitter office into bedrooms for the staff to sleep overnight and stay overtime for long hours away. Firing everyone who worked remotely and sent out emails to demand and swear allegiance to the sweat shop. The remain staff needing to work double time, to make up for the other missing half, while attempting to also learn those positions and knowledge too.

Elon now refusing to even pay the rent for that now illegally made slave worker sweat shop, still called the Twitter offices.

A child slavery sweat shop would provide more humane working conditions... Don't get me started on the Tesla company, gees. Safety and quality control thrown out the window.

No comment on the sweat shop conditions.
But I'm not surprised to see a bunch of people fired. That was to be expected based on the rhetoric surrounding the "take over". What I am a bit surprised to see is that it's running as well as it did before, only now a different set of people are raising a fuss.

The recent release of those slack conversations between Twitter staff is interesting stuff, no doubt.

[temper]

I've heard more about Musk in the past month than I have my entire life (or at least ever since he first started becoming relevant), and honestly I couldn't care less about him or what goes on with twitter. Twitter has always been garbage anyway and honestly he would be doing the public a service by shutting the entire thing down.

[Crashed]

temper :)님이 먼저 게시:

I've heard more about Musk in the past month than I have my entire life (or at least ever since he first started becoming relevant), and honestly I couldn't care less about him or what goes on with twitter. Twitter has always been garbage anyway and honestly he would be doing the public a service by shutting the entire thing down.

Except he is trying to take out the competition by banning linking to them.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Plaid님이 먼저 게시:

Azza ☠님이 먼저 게시:

Twitter had 7500 staff, which was logically part of what Elon Musk had purchased (skilled and knowledgeable, already trained and know Twitters coding/functioning requirements).

Elon Musk had dropped that figure to less than 2900 Twitter staff. He had actually fired every single programmer and had the trust/safety staff down to 12 with full access still allowed.

He then hired the ex-hacker George Hotz, who had previously (illegally at the time) jail broke the apple iphone to work free for 12 weeks as a cheap intern. Demanding that he fixes everything. Still clueless in providing another reason for Apple to drop Twitter, yet goes out of his way to scapegoat blame other reasons.

Changed the Twitter office into bedrooms for the staff to sleep overnight and stay overtime for long hours away. Firing everyone who worked remotely and sent out emails to demand and swear allegiance to the sweat shop. The remain staff needing to work double time, to make up for the other missing half, while attempting to also learn those positions and knowledge too.

Elon now refusing to even pay the rent for that now illegally made slave worker sweat shop, still called the Twitter offices.

A child slavery sweat shop would provide more humane working conditions... Don't get me started on the Tesla company, gees. Safety and quality control thrown out the window.

No comment on the sweat shop conditions.
But I'm not surprised to see a bunch of people fired. That was to be expected based on the rhetoric surrounding the "take over". What I am a bit surprised to see is that it's running as well as it did before, only now a different set of people are raising a fuss.

The recent release of those slack conversations between Twitter staff is interesting stuff, no doubt.

There were reports that he was going to lay off like 75% of the current staff when he took over.

When he took over, a good chunk quit, he laid off like 30% of what remained, and now we have the current staff.

[temper]

Crashed님이 먼저 게시:

temper :)님이 먼저 게시:

I've heard more about Musk in the past month than I have my entire life (or at least ever since he first started becoming relevant), and honestly I couldn't care less about him or what goes on with twitter. Twitter has always been garbage anyway and honestly he would be doing the public a service by shutting the entire thing down.

Except he is trying to take out the competition by banning linking to them.

I still don't care to be honest, and as far as I know doing stuff like that is completely legal. Valve for example could ban links to third party websites on these forums if they wanted to.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Crashed님이 먼저 게시:

temper :)님이 먼저 게시:

I've heard more about Musk in the past month than I have my entire life (or at least ever since he first started becoming relevant), and honestly I couldn't care less about him or what goes on with twitter. Twitter has always been garbage anyway and honestly he would be doing the public a service by shutting the entire thing down.

Except he is trying to take out the competition by banning linking to them.

I mean, how would that be 'taking them out'? Is Twitter required to allow advertisements of what are considered competitors?

I don't care either way but I don't see how it's 'trying to take them out' by now allowing their links. Labeling them as malicious is a different ballgame though.

[HypersleepyNaputunia]

now that african-americans own it everyone hates it for some reason

[Crashed]

temper :)님이 먼저 게시:

Crashed님이 먼저 게시:

Except he is trying to take out the competition by banning linking to them.

I still don't care to be honest, and as far as I know doing stuff like that is completely legal. Valve for example could ban links to third party websites on these forums if they wanted to.

If Valve were banning links to legitimate sites like GOG and Epic, that could run into antitrust issues however.

[Crashed]

KittenGrindr님이 먼저 게시:

Crashed님이 먼저 게시:

Except he is trying to take out the competition by banning linking to them.

I mean, how would that be 'taking them out'? Is Twitter required to allow advertisements of what are considered competitors?

I don't care either way but I don't see how it's 'trying to take them out' by now allowing their links. Labeling them as malicious is a different ballgame though.

They have banned entirely links to anything on any of the top Mastodon instances, claiming they are malicious. Same if you link to your Mastodon profile in your bio.

[Ulfrinn]

temper :)님이 먼저 게시:

I've heard more about Musk in the past month than I have my entire life (or at least ever since he first started becoming relevant), and honestly I couldn't care less about him or what goes on with twitter. Twitter has always been garbage anyway and honestly he would be doing the public a service by shutting the entire thing down.

That should show you just how biased these "reporters" are. Twitter behaves like Twitter for a decade, silence. Twitter starts doing to them what old Twitter was doing to everyone else, and that happens to encompass the ideologies of those reporters (and media outlets) and it's suddenly the end of the world. That level of double-standards in how "news" is being reported is quite dangerous behavior.

[HypersleepyNaputunia]

can windows ban your ability to view sites it doesnt like - like is it technically legal
like goggle can filter away sites it doesnt want you to see to the deep backpage results