Instalar o Steam
Iniciar sessão
|
Idioma
简体中文 (Chinês Simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês Tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol de Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol da América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Brasil)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar problema de tradução
you are only prying open the gaping mouth between words and reality further apart.
Myself, I was born into a Mormon family who left the Mormon church and were general non-denominational Christian. In my teens I was a staunch atheist. By my 20s I had softened my atheist stance into more of a agnostic one in which I refused to commit to anything. Then I briefly had a stint as a born-again Christian, which fizzled back into agnosticism. Today I'm more of a deist who entertains the possibility of spirituality but recognizes that from my limited perspective I can never know for certain.
There is other things that remain, in my case, I want to understand as many things as possible about our world and the beings who live on it. We'll never fully understand it, so it's also something that will remain, no matter what. The faith you talk about appear to me to be just the default solution, the easiest one, but you can always do your things without it.
So, everything has to be proved, except that one ? Why ? I'll don't gonna believe in something you're unable to prove, period. And, when you know how religions have evolved over time ... At the start it was about spirits of nature, that kind of things, then entire pantheons of gods, now monotheism. For the logic behind is, you need something impressive to serve as an autority argument. Nature was sufficient at the beginning, but when the forces of nature were used by us at our advantages, we've needed something better. So instead of spirits we've invented gods for everything. And when even that wasn't enough anymore, they've invented monotheism, one only OP god who created everything, the thing look like a bad comic character.
What I gain ? Nobody can manipulate me because of religion, nobody can influence me into sacrifying myself or my own for a "superior being". Nor convince me that being successfull in this life isn't important (like I've said, you'll very probably don't gonna have a second chance). And I don't like to invest in scams, I have more interresting things to learn than centuries old books about ancient fairytales. The two books the most readed by humans are 1- The Bible / 2- Elements. Elements is a book about geometry and mathematics, used during centuries by engineers and other jobs like that. One is a story to compensate fragile minsets, the other was actually very usefull.
Evolution.
Not being manipulated, remain free from influences. And like I've said, I obtain everything I need from other sources anyway. That work well so far.
I've already explained this. When you observe how nature works, it produce new iterations of lifeforms, either they're better, either they dissapear. So explain me why this natural selection seem to apply to everyone, except deads ? I just see no logical reasons to do that. there is also something else. I've seen a lot of old persons or mentally ill peoples having personality changes, because something happened to their brain. If brain injuries / illnesses can do that, what's the point of a soul ? If it don't allow you to remain "you" ... Our brain actually exist, but our soul ? I see no evidences of it's existence.
Again, that's those who pretend there is an afterlife who have to prove it exist. If you say to me to believe in it without proofs, it's totally fine to reject it without proofs. Especially if it make little sense. Again, can you remember anything before you were born ? I can't and there is a very likely explication about it ... Because you don't exist yet and after death you probably don't exist anymore.
Again, what is said without proofs can be rejected without proofs. I don't know, but it's so unlikely that I've decided to take a decision about it : to don't count on it and to don't believe in it. What's rare is precious, it's economy's basics here. That's actually the contrary, what's the point about preserving obsessively something that gonna remain no matter what ? There is no need to and that's also what lead peoples to become terrorists, appealed by some afterlife's rewards. If you don't believe in it at all, you can't be manipulated by that kind of tricks.
Not only strengh, knowledge and friends too. And yes, that's what I really need, but I don't need imaginary friends in my head, I see no purpose for them.
Actually, being an atheist is choosing to not believe at all ...
yes, advancement in gathering knowledge in most areas is unprecedented, but will of using that knowledge still is the same as ever. egocentrism is still main driving phenomena, despite of us knowing about it.
"earth is center of the universe" is being replaced with something else. to "our social evolution", as one example. and so on.
Both viewpoints require faith. The believer has faith that God exists. The atheist has faith that God does not exist.
The agnostic has no faith. He can't be certain if God does or does not exist, and he just leaves it at that.
That said I don't like hype and spoilers.
Pass
BUT, it's each to their own, I personally don't care what anybody thinks or believes in, it has zero bearing on my life and everyone is completely free to believe in whatever they want to