Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Just give up on talking with that troll.
The UK is the next greatest power, but even they don't have the raw strength to really fill the void. Rather, a variety of local powers would rise to prominence. Russia, Iran and its allies, Japan, Turkey, etc.
Fair point.
The US loss in Vietnam has less to do with "lol muricans r bad" and more to do with asymmetrical warfare.
They were fighting a defensive war in their land in terrain they knew well. It was a logistical nightmare for the same reasons that Iraq was a logistical nightmare, for the same reasons that fighting a war in the US or Russia would be a nightmare, et cetera.
The U.S. has the ability to release more firepower on the world that has ever seen before
Rome gave us Christianity and conquered the world
China gave is the rocket and conquered the world
The British settled the U.S. and conquered the world
And that means it wasn't a defeat for the British? Besides its not like this was the only war Britain has lost ever.