安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
He actually got that (as I did) from Google. If you google "sport" (without the quote marks) you get a definition that includes exertion.
That is one such definition, but not in others. If you look at the others he provided: under some definitions "competitiveness" is optional, it isn't to others. Each of those definitions would rule out many activities many consider sports, the Wikipedia one seems to rule out non-group games as sports. Motor-cross and car racing is ruled out in half, also.
He's engaging in what is called "no True Scotsman", by arbitrarily ruling out activities as sports.
He just seems angry all the time he posts here, everyone who disagrees "must" be an idiot. Maybe he should take up a sport to calm down or something.
Without looking at the formal definition of "exertion", I would think that it would vary from person to person. Someone who is morbidly obese, who uses a mobility scooter to get around, would find getting up to get a glass of water to be extreamly exhausting.
I power walk about 8km a day. This is an activity I have done for over 10 years. So walking the .8km to the store is nothing to me, where it might be vary hard for someone else.
True, which is why it's a bad idea to use it as part of a definition of sports or physical activity.
Anyone who is seriously into chess knows it's not "just" a mental game, just as tennis or basketball isn't just "physical" either, Stephen Hawking would not be able to play chess well. It's exhausting to sit and concentrate at peak capacity for five to six hours at the time, you have to invest an lot into your body if you want to play well for extended periods of time. That takes a ♥♥♥♥-load of discipline. Healthy mind in a healthy body and all that.
But where do you stop? Chess is a board game. Can we consider Monopoly a sport too? It is also a board game. What about the board game of Risk? That takes a lot of mental consitration. Should Risk be a sport too?
When looking at this topic, I have to take the formal definition of the word along with what is in the spirit of the word.
Are video games a sport? In my mind, no. There is no real physical activity to it. It does require very good hand-eye coordination, that is true. But one does not need to be "mentally fit" to be able to play video games. I have seen people with the mentallity of a three year old play some video games very well. These people are not mentally fit.
My peronsal opinion on this matter is this. If we look at the Olympics, we can get a pretty good definition of what a "sport" really is. Not all sports are played in the Olypics, but all thing in the Olypics are sports. We do not have auto racing in the Olympics. I doubt we ever will see that. It does not require any type of physical activity that might make someone tired. I can play a game for 9 hours strait and not get tired.
It seems to me that what is or isn't a sport is fluid, honestly I don't have too much of an issue with either Monopoly or Risk being sports either (though the randomness factor of these games might be a case against).
Playing video games for nine hours straight might not be particularly taxing, but what if you were competing at professional level, with an live audience, large sums of money being involved, your international ranking and reputation at stake? It's a completely different kettle of fish. If you are playing a game like Chess, you want to avoid making lazy or bad moves as much as possible, there is no reload button.
By that logic, competitive masturbatin can be a sport as well.
Only by pendantic people without an actual argument.
If you listen to them reading a book should be called a "physical activity" because it involves some minor motor functions. Breaking wind could be a sport.
I can see computer games being one of those things where it could technically be defined as a sport. Hand eye coordination, physical speed, accuracy and reflexes are all important. It can be trained and it plays a major part in how a competitor does.
Does my ability to move peices better than my opponant affect a game of chess? No, it has no bearing at all on the game. It could easily be done by a third party without affecting the match in the slightest. Trying to argue its a physical activity and therefore a sport is ridiculous. Its a game, as is poker.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=definition+of+physical+activity
Chess can be physical, sitting down for hours concentrating at peak capacity requires an immense amount of discipline and energy, it's not just mind-power at work. Bobby Fisher worked that out an long time ago, no serious Chess Grandmaster today excludes physical exercise from their training regime.
It's a cliché, but it's true: healthy mind in a healthy body. Stephen Hawkins would not be able to play chess very well, you need constant concentration to play chess, you cannot do it in bursts.