Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
I don't know about poker, but the IOC and many others recognise bridge and chess as sports, even if there is no chess or bridge Olympic events. By your definition, motor racing might not be considered a sport either.
That said, I'm on the fence when it comes to eSports.
a majority of the USA considers poker a sport despite it not requiring any physical activity though. So I still see no problem with considering games a sport if we consider other things with almost no physical exertion.
Sport and game isn't up for debate, they have clear and consise definitions. Poker is absolutley 100% not a sport and it doesn't matter how many USA citizens think it should be.
Town planning, poetry, sculptures and many others, yes. But the IOC had never called them sports, they stopped awarding medals for non-sporting events nearly 100 years ago. But they have recognised chess and bridge as sports however, and still do.
Of course they aren't the end-all when it comes to defining what is and isn't a sport, but honestly, I rather side with them on this then you.
That is completely not true, the fact you (and others) are taking a completely different view from the world's most recognised sporting body is testament to this.
Read my link above regarding the "essentialism" of games. There is nothing "universal" about all games that makes them games, same could be said for sports.
Go look up a definition of sport.
In every case you'll see the words "physical activity".
Poker and Chess are not, and will never be, sports. They are by definiton games. It doesn't matter how many fat americans watch poker on late night TV. They might try and make it seem more impressive by calling it a sport. But until the definition of the words changes, it isn't one.
Calling chess and poker a sport, pull the other one. If Stephen Hawking can play it, it's not a sport.
I did, that's how I found out the IOC calls chess a sport. Do realise that there are plenty of different and valid definitions of it.
Unless chess is played by psychics, it is counted as a physical activity; you know what else is a physical activity? Dairy writing and milking cows. See how useless that criteria is?
Please, by all means take your claim up to the IOC and the various international chess and sports federations that call it a sport.
Your mistake is engaging in essentialism, there is nothing 'essential' that unites sports and games.
Well we already established the IOC is meaningless and I don't think the chess boards can be considered reliable.
In fact trying to call it a sport, when its clearly not, is exactly the type of sad pathetic thing I would expect from those with a vested interest in the game.
As for what defines physical acticity I already covered that. If someone paralysed from the neck down can play it, it's not a sport.
Oh and i'll let you read the definition of the word so you can try and figure out what the "essential" part is.
Google (Dictionary.com)
Wikipedia.
Dictionary.com
thefreedictionary.com
Merriam webster dictionary.
Yes pressing keys involved physical movement, but no. It was not a "physical activity" or exertion. Exertion implies strenuous effort.
If I had one of those nifty computers stephen hawking does, that speaks for him, I could play chess or poker without literally needing to move at all. The ability to move a peice or pick up and look at your cards is not at all critical to the game, anyone could do that for you. A robot could do it for you, a monkey could.
No, only you called IOC "useless" for no good reason. They had never called "town planning" a sport, the Olympics revival movement of the early 20th Century wanted to reward more than just sporting prowess, this stopped an long time ago.
What you defined as "physical activity" does not appear in any definition of the term I have ever seen or used. Like the other poster said, it could mean virtually anything. Nothing from your definitions necessarily exclude chess or bridge from sports either. Not that dictionary definitions are useful as anything more than a simple guide to words, ignoring the fact the different definitions you gave actually contradict each other.
"Physical activity" does not imply exertion, that is entirely your own invention.