Ethan Klein (h3h3) has been BANNED from YOUTUBE!

[ambi]

what do YOU think?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spSguzSLBh4

[Out Of Bubblegum]

Nguyên văn bởi Snow ☯:

Capitalism has made more rags to riches then any other system. I think that's definitely a pro.

But right now about 10 people have 1/2 of the wealth in the USA. 10 people. Even China is becoming like that. There needs to be better controls and regulations. May be too late now, The horse is gone. Closing the barn door now is too late. Only a complete collapse will work?

[Boblin the Goblin]

Nguyên văn bởi Out Of Bubblegum:

Nguyên văn bởi Snow ☯:

Capitalism has made more rags to riches then any other system. I think that's definitely a pro.

But right now about 10 people have 1/2 of the wealth in the USA. 10 people. Even China is becoming like that. There needs to be better controls and regulations. May be too late now, The horse is gone. Closing the barn door now is too late. Only a complete collapse will work?

You're measuring by net worth aren't you?

[Mad Scientist]

Nguyên văn bởi eram:

Not banned, suspended for a week. Back on Friday for the Halloween show.
wEthan.

They're far too lenient with that channel.

Nguyên văn bởi Thermal Lance:

Yeah, no matter the politics and all that crap. H3H3 really did questionable stuff over the years. I wouldnt be against him having some time to reflect on that because really its not the time to snap people around.

It would be better likely for his own mental issues, if the site barred him entirely. There's a point of time when someone's a liability when you keep letting them try to rile up supporters to do unlawful or unethical things, especially the terrorism one.

[eichiban]

Nguyên văn bởi Snow ☯:

Capitalism has made more rags to riches then any other system. I think that's definitely a pro.

Hahahaha! Yep, that's why every instant wealth is more concentrated in less hands... https://www.statista.com/statistics/299460/distribution-of-wealth-in-the-united-states/
http://www.econ.yale.edu/smith/hks_v13.pdf
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/distribution-of-global-wealth-chart/

[Chunk Norris ☯]

Nguyên văn bởi Out Of Bubblegum:

Nguyên văn bởi Snow ☯:

Capitalism has made more rags to riches then any other system. I think that's definitely a pro.

But right now about 10 people have 1/2 of the wealth in the USA. 10 people. Even China is becoming like that. There needs to be better controls and regulations. May be too late now, The horse is gone. Closing the barn door now is too late. Only a complete collapse will work?

Okay....so? Greed used to be a bad thing and I'm not talking about the rich guy I'm talking about everyone else that is looking at what their neighbor has and thinking I should have a piece of what they own.

Want to make those folks less rich? Perhaps end socialism/croney capitalism that protects or bails out these very rich people.

[Out Of Bubblegum]

Nguyên văn bởi KittenGrindr:

Nguyên văn bởi Out Of Bubblegum:

But right now about 10 people have 1/2 of the wealth in the USA. 10 people. Even China is becoming like that. There needs to be better controls and regulations. May be too late now, The horse is gone. Closing the barn door now is too late. Only a complete collapse will work?

You're measuring by net worth aren't you?

No matter how you measure it, it is not good for everyone else. Those 10 people can't possibly spend even 10% of it all.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Nguyên văn bởi Out Of Bubblegum:

Nguyên văn bởi KittenGrindr:

You're measuring by net worth aren't you?

No matter how you measure it, it is not good for everyone else. Those 10 people can't possibly spend even 10% of it all.

Except 'net worth' isn't actual money being held. So yes, it does matter.

You can't 'spend' assets, only sell/transfer them.

[eichiban]

Nguyên văn bởi KittenGrindr:

Nguyên văn bởi eichiban:

Not very talkative, I see

Gonna answer or just be evasive?

Ask properly if you want an answer. Try to ask something with more that 2 words. Please, be more concrete that "By who?" I did not know what were you exactly asking.

[Chunk Norris ☯]

Nguyên văn bởi eichiban:

Nguyên văn bởi Snow ☯:

Capitalism has made more rags to riches then any other system. I think that's definitely a pro.

Hahahaha! Yep, that's why every instant wealth is more concentrated in less hands... https://www.statista.com/statistics/299460/distribution-of-wealth-in-the-united-states/
http://www.econ.yale.edu/smith/hks_v13.pdf
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/distribution-of-global-wealth-chart/

So what system has made other people rich, you're taking a stat that says more money is in the hands of certain people and pretending like that somehow props up other systems which haven't made people rich. And even if it's concentrated in the hands of certain people that doesn't mean it didn't make rags to riches stores..

Didn't Bill Gates start off working out of a garage? Didn't Orpah start rag to riches? Even Ethan Klien is living in a Mansion in LA and according to the internet worth 25 million.

If Ethan was living in a place like Germany and he made a statement about supporting gassing the Jews, would he still be able to have his tv-show?? Would he be in jail right now? He should thank Capitalism.

[Thermal Lance]

Nguyên văn bởi Out Of Bubblegum:

Nguyên văn bởi Snow ☯:

Capitalism has made more rags to riches then any other system. I think that's definitely a pro.

But right now about 10 people have 1/2 of the wealth in the USA. 10 people. Even China is becoming like that. There needs to be better controls and regulations. May be too late now, The horse is gone. Closing the barn door now is too late. Only a complete collapse will work?

Heh, I never saw a problem with only a few having all of it if they did it legally. The thing that rubs me the wrong way is when they dont pay back a just part to the country that allows them to make that money. When they cheat and dodge to avoid paying their due. Or when they find any reason whatsoever to underpay their employees.

Like it or not... But some people are REALLY dominant in business and sooner or later they end up racking the whole table. Would need quite draconian regulations to avoid that. To the point they might just go do business elsewhere.

[Out Of Bubblegum]

Nguyên văn bởi Snow ☯:

Perhaps end socialism /croney capitalism that protects or bails out these very rich people.

You misspelled Conservatism.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Nguyên văn bởi Out Of Bubblegum:

Nguyên văn bởi Snow ☯:

Perhaps end socialism /croney capitalism that protects or bails out these very rich people.

You misspelled Conservatism.

Ah yes, the conservative state of California that has harbored billion dollar corporations and protected them from taxes for decades.

I also love how, without fail, you will go on about conservatives in any post you start to comment on.

[Chunk Norris ☯]

Nguyên văn bởi Out Of Bubblegum:

Nguyên văn bởi Snow ☯:

Perhaps end socialism /croney capitalism that protects or bails out these very rich people.

You misspelled Conservatism.

Conservatives want small government, small enough that they aren't going to be bailing out anyone.

[Thermal Lance]

Nguyên văn bởi KittenGrindr:

Nguyên văn bởi Out Of Bubblegum:

You misspelled Conservatism.

Ah yes, the conservative state of California that has harbored billion dollar corporations and protected them from taxes for decades.

Man, I'll repeat what I always say to people bringing points like this. Whataboutism leads nowhere. Not only its almost an admission of what youre trying to distract from but on top of it you reply with a claim you have to support as well.

Whataboutism is not a good strategy, never has been.

Just a tip.

[eichiban]

Nguyên văn bởi Snow ☯:

Nguyên văn bởi eichiban:

Hahahaha! Yep, that's why every instant wealth is more concentrated in less hands... https://www.statista.com/statistics/299460/distribution-of-wealth-in-the-united-states/
http://www.econ.yale.edu/smith/hks_v13.pdf
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/distribution-of-global-wealth-chart/

So what system has made other people rich, you're taking a stat that says more money is in the hands of certain people and pretending like that somehow props up other systems which haven't made people rich. And even if it's concentrated in the hands of certain people that doesn't mean it didn't make rags to riches stores..

Didn't Bill Gates start off working out of a garage? Didn't Orpah start rag to riches?

Yeah, you know that a lot of Spainiards that went with empty hands to South America also made it from rags to riches? I hope you got what I am meaning. Also, you tell me about two stories of rag to riches, but I wonder how many stories of people went from humble origins to poor as rats are being omitted. Those are never told.