安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
No. No prank or trolling intended. I'm legitimately curious as to why so many modern western video games have ugly characters front and center. And not just ugly characters. But ugly worlds and ugly UI too. I hate minimalism and flat design with a passion.
Bro have you seen the latest adverts from clothing and fashion companies? They find the fattest, ugliest most horrible looking to people to promote their products. I'm not gonna buy anything after seeing such gross things.
Sorry, but you're flat out wrong about everything you've said here.
Period.
I don't know why you would ever double down on your blatant incorrect statements about video games and now advertisements.
Please stop, it only hurts you to keep spreading misinformation.
That's a good point.
THe OP is just blatantly making false claims against a lot of games.
Ah..
Well, I agree that Art Design is very important, especially in games that emphasis their visual presentation.
I... have a near unlimited amount of Suck when it comes to Art Design capability. (Obeying, promoting, and constructing a cohesive visual theme.) Though, I'm OK on near realism or at least "more realistic than popcorn-art..."
Don't underestimate Asset Flipping... It exists.
Again, though, I absolutely agree with you on the importance of having a very good, well-seasoned, Art Director in any major development effort. It's absolutely a necessary position that must be filled to keep everyone on track. Without it... the quality of the game can suffer as a whole just from a few repeated mistakes.
So, putting in artistically themed characters in a realistic environment might be edgy... or so jarring it's too terrible to endure.
Take the example of that pic of headshots that was provided:
The overwhelming artistic influence there isn't "ugly." It is, instead, "adolescence" with a bit of "sex ambiguity" in certain characters, though not terribly so ambiguous in this example, that is so very favored by some in their Far Eastern Themed games. (Anime/whatever) So, it seeks to appeal primarily to those that like that style. (The artist has an "upper lip" issue, though. It's not an easy area to judge - The angle is difficult to get right, 'cause reasons.)
So:
Art direction is very important and it needs to be in evidence in all aspects of a suitable game. (IMO and, I think, your own.)
And, not all artistic direction/themes are favored by all gamers. I, for instance, couldn't easily see myself playing the sort of game that pic would imply. I'd just feel it was a bit too silly for me. I've played games with that sort of them, but that's back when they on very limited consoles where everything was just... pixelated, despite the pics on the box. I could stomach such stuff, then.
In essence: I think with pointing out Art Direction, you've pretty much answered your own question - Yes, some games don't have good Art Direction and not all artistic themes are going to be liked by all gamers.
It is all a matter of subjectivity, but most of those characters look in my opinion, atleast like a young adult (most of them much older)
The screenshot is from the game, the outer worlds
Google it and you will see too much focus on those apperences or a few quest about females being power, enough to take away focus on the actual gameplay... sadly..
People however always have a choice and I respect that, if they don´t like a genre or a style, then it is perfectly fine not to play (or watch for that matter)
"Women?"
Uh... lol. Sorry, I don't see many faces that are overtly female, there. (I just looked at the pic without reading, sorry.) Certainly, not using generally accepted design characteristics. By that, I mean classic female facial characteristics. Many of these would not be likely natural results or would be among a very small subset of results that many would consider "mannish" in appearance. That's not a bias/gender thing, just a very simple, clearly defined, set of physiological standards that are commonly present in human skulls...
And, if they're intended to all be female... well, that artistic intent is not clearly presented.
Bro I just took a better look at your pics. Holy crap. I thought those were all teenage boys for a second. Not one of them looked like a woman. It's not the lack of hair and make up. It's the masculinized facial features. No matter how much they try to mask it. The maleness permeates through the face and skin. I swear I've seen some of these 'women' at my local community college protesting against the local female fitness center's pretty women posters.
Sorry, that doesn't make any sense, Mork.
It's very obvious all those are women, and they all have the distinctive human faces of women.
I'm not sure how you're claiming they don't fit the standard way human skulls are done, when it's very obvious they are 100% human females.
Nor again, do any of them look slightly young.
ALso, since women can sometimes have hair on their face, as part of a bit of an awkward genetic quark, I don't see how facial features in video games have to be about as good as Sophie Lauren back in her prime. :P
It's really evident all those are women and they are artistically designed to be women, and have every female characteristic human women have in their facial features.
Why again are you lying so blatantly about video game characters?
It makes no sense.
You can never claim any of those people are ugly, it literally cannot be done by a human being. :P